Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
55
FINO.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.51
Seasonality move
:
13.48%
Day range:
$30.51 - $30.51
52-week range:
$20.43 - $32.79
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1
Avg. volume:
260
1-year change:
10.01%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GIQG.B.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
$30.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GIQG.B.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
$36.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.02% | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
$10.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
$28.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | 1.025 | -- | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
GIQG.B.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | 0.850 | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
-- | 1.018 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FINO.TO
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSGE.NO
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GIQG.B.TO
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNXT.TO
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCGG.TO
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FINO.TO or CSGE.NO?
CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net margin of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- CSGE.NOCIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FINO.TO or CSGE.NO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has higher upside potential than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF, analysts believe Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is more attractive than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 CSGE.NOCIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is FINO.TO or CSGE.NO More Risky?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FINO.TO or CSGE.NO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FINO.TO or CSGE.NO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is -- versus -- for CIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -- CSGE.NOCIBC Sustainable Global Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FINO.TO or GIQG.B.TO?
Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net margin of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- GIQG.B.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FINO.TO or GIQG.B.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has higher upside potential than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged, analysts believe Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is more attractive than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 GIQG.B.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged0 0 0 -
Is FINO.TO or GIQG.B.TO More Risky?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.974%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FINO.TO or GIQG.B.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FINO.TO or GIQG.B.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is -- versus -- for Guardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -- GIQG.B.TOGuardian i3 Global Quality Growth ETF Unhedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FINO.TO or MNXT.TO?
Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net margin of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FINO.TO or MNXT.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF, analysts believe Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is more attractive than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is FINO.TO or MNXT.TO More Risky?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FINO.TO or MNXT.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FINO.TO or MNXT.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -- MNXT.TOMackenzie Bluewater Next Gen Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FINO.TO or SCGG.TO?
Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net margin of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FINO.TO or SCGG.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has higher upside potential than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF, analysts believe Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is more attractive than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is FINO.TO or SCGG.TO More Risky?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FINO.TO or SCGG.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FINO.TO or SCGG.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is -- versus -- for Starlight Global Growth Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -- SCGG.TOStarlight Global Growth Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FINO.TO or TTTX.TO?
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A has a net margin of -- compared to Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net margin of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's return on equity of -- beat Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- TTTX.TOGlobal X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FINO.TO or TTTX.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has higher upside potential than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A, analysts believe Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is more attractive than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series0 0 0 TTTX.TOGlobal X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A0 0 0 -
Is FINO.TO or TTTX.TO More Risky?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FINO.TO or TTTX.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FINO.TO or TTTX.TO?
Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's net income of -- is lower than Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Innovation Fund ETF Series is -- versus -- for Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FINO.TOFranklin Innovation Fund ETF Series-- -- -- -- TTTX.TOGlobal X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Idx ETF Cl A-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 16
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
Sell
48
SEI alert for Dec 16
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. [SEI] is down 5.3% over the past day.
Sell
50
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
