Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
63
GBAL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$57.38
Seasonality move
:
-0.67%
Day range:
$57.38 - $57.38
52-week range:
$47.75 - $58.35
Dividend yield:
1.94%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
369
Avg. volume:
2.9K
1-year change:
9.09%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PABF.TO
Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$57.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 1.94% | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
$30.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 1.62% | -- |
|
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
|
$66.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.42% | -- |
|
PABF.TO
Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF
|
$25.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 4.81% | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
$25.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 2.33% | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
$18.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.55% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.565 | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | 0.546 | -- | -- |
|
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.717 | -- | -- |
|
PABF.TO
Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF
|
-- | 0.463 | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
-- | 0.515 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGAA.TO
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGRO.TO
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PABF.TO
Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCNS.TO
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GBAL.TO or CGAA.TO?
CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GBAL.TO or CGAA.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF, analysts believe iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF0 0 0 -
Is GBAL.TO or CGAA.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.418% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF has a beta of 0.496, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.394%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBAL.TO or CGAA.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBAL.TO or CGAA.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for CI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- CGAA.TOCI Global Asset Allocation Private Pool ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GBAL.TO or GGRO.TO?
iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- GGRO.TOiShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GBAL.TO or GGRO.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio, analysts believe iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 GGRO.TOiShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is GBAL.TO or GGRO.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.418% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.719%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBAL.TO or GGRO.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBAL.TO or GGRO.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- GGRO.TOiShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GBAL.TO or PABF.TO?
Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- PABF.TOPurpose Active Balanced Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GBAL.TO or PABF.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF, analysts believe iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 PABF.TOPurpose Active Balanced Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is GBAL.TO or PABF.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.418% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBAL.TO or PABF.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBAL.TO or PABF.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for Purpose Active Balanced Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- PABF.TOPurpose Active Balanced Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio, analysts believe iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 -
Is GBAL.TO or XCNS.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.418% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.564%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBAL.TO or XCNS.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for iShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- XCNS.TOiShares Core Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GBAL.TO or ZMI.TO?
BMO Monthly Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net margin of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's return on equity of -- beat BMO Monthly Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- ZMI.TOBMO Monthly Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GBAL.TO or ZMI.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Monthly Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has higher upside potential than BMO Monthly Income ETF, analysts believe iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is more attractive than BMO Monthly Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio0 0 0 ZMI.TOBMO Monthly Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is GBAL.TO or ZMI.TO More Risky?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.418% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Monthly Income ETF has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.784%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBAL.TO or ZMI.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. BMO Monthly Income ETF offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Monthly Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBAL.TO or ZMI.TO?
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Monthly Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's net income of -- is lower than BMO Monthly Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Monthly Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio is -- versus -- for BMO Monthly Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBAL.TOiShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio-- -- -- -- ZMI.TOBMO Monthly Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
