FF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Andean Precious Metals Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to First Mining Gold Corp.'s net margin of 48.37%. First Mining Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -11.72% beat Andean Precious Metals Corp.'s return on equity of 44.37%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.81, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Andean Precious Metals Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that First Mining Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Andean Precious Metals Corp., analysts believe First Mining Gold Corp. is more attractive than Andean Precious Metals Corp..

First Mining Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Andean Precious Metals Corp. has a beta of 2.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 171.915%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Andean Precious Metals Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Mining Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Andean Precious Metals Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Mining Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Andean Precious Metals Corp. quarterly revenues of $124.5M. First Mining Gold Corp.'s net income of -$22M is lower than Andean Precious Metals Corp.'s net income of $60.2M. Notably, First Mining Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Andean Precious Metals Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Mining Gold Corp. is -- versus 3.46x for Andean Precious Metals Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to First Mining Gold Corp.'s net margin of 25.53%. First Mining Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -11.72% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.81, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Mining Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe First Mining Gold Corp. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

First Mining Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.155%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Mining Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Mining Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. First Mining Gold Corp.'s net income of -$22M is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, First Mining Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Mining Gold Corp. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to First Mining Gold Corp.'s net margin of -74.66%. First Mining Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -11.72% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.81, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 221.43%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than First Mining Gold Corp., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than First Mining Gold Corp..

First Mining Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.342%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Mining Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Mining Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. First Mining Gold Corp.'s net income of -$22M is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, First Mining Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Mining Gold Corp. is -- versus 3.28x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Mining Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. First Mining Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -11.72% beat Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.12%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of $0.81, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $0.45 which suggests that it could grow by 63.64%. Given that Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has higher upside potential than First Mining Gold Corp., analysts believe Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. is more attractive than First Mining Gold Corp..

First Mining Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.009%.

First Mining Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Mining Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Mining Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lake Victoria Gold Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Mining Gold Corp.'s net income of -$22M is lower than Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, First Mining Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Mining Gold Corp. is -- versus -- for Lake Victoria Gold Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.