Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
24
CUTL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.12
Seasonality move
:
-1.15%
Day range:
$22.61 - $22.61
52-week range:
$20.83 - $23.68
Dividend yield:
7.27%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
50
Avg. volume:
32
1-year change:
2.08%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
$22.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 7.27% | -- |
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
$24.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 4.15% | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF
|
$25.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.07% | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
$9.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 12.17% | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
$155.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.99 | 2.5% | -- |
|
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF
|
$38.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 3.37% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF
|
-- | 0.292 | -- | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
-- | 0.533 | -- | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | 0.491 | -- | -- |
|
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.419 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCII.TO
Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CUTL.TO or BLOV.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUTL.TO or BLOV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF, analysts believe CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged0 0 0 BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is CUTL.TO or BLOV.TO More Risky?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.403%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUTL.TO or BLOV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUTL.TO or BLOV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUTL.TO or FCII.TO?
Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- FCII.TOFranklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUTL.TO or FCII.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF, analysts believe CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged0 0 0 FCII.TOFranklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF0 0 0 -
Is CUTL.TO or FCII.TO More Risky?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUTL.TO or FCII.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUTL.TO or FCII.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Franklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- FCII.TOFranklin ClearBridge Global InfraFd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUTL.TO or PDIV.TO?
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- PDIV.TOPurpose Enhanced Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUTL.TO or PDIV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF, analysts believe CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged0 0 0 PDIV.TOPurpose Enhanced Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is CUTL.TO or PDIV.TO More Risky?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.763%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUTL.TO or PDIV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF offers a yield of 12.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUTL.TO or PDIV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- PDIV.TOPurpose Enhanced Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUTL.TO or QINF.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUTL.TO or QINF.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF, analysts believe CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged0 0 0 QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CUTL.TO or QINF.TO More Risky?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.635%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUTL.TO or QINF.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUTL.TO or QINF.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CUTL.TO or TLV.TO?
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net margin of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- TLV.TOInvesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CUTL.TO or TLV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF, analysts believe CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is more attractive than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged0 0 0 TLV.TOInvesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is CUTL.TO or TLV.TO More Risky?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.557%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CUTL.TO or TLV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CUTL.TO or TLV.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- -- TLV.TOInvesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Idx ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 11.21% over the past day.
Sell
45
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 1% over the past day.
Buy
75
AFRM alert for Dec 17
Affirm Holdings, Inc. [AFRM] is up 0.18% over the past day.
