Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
61
BLOV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.78
Seasonality move
:
1.57%
Day range:
$24.78 - $24.78
52-week range:
$22.14 - $25.16
Dividend yield:
4.15%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
211
1-year change:
6.54%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDF.TO
Purpose Core Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WSRI.TO
Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
$24.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 4.15% | -- |
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
$22.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 7.27% | -- |
|
PDF.TO
Purpose Core Dividend ETF
|
$38.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 3.79% | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
$9.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 12.17% | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
$39.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.75 | 1.88% | -- |
|
WSRI.TO
Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF
|
$48.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.11% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
PDF.TO
Purpose Core Dividend ETF
|
-- | 0.716 | -- | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
-- | 0.533 | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.471 | -- | -- |
|
WSRI.TO
Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.886 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLOV.TO
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUTL.TO
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDF.TO
Purpose Core Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WSRI.TO
Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BLOV.TO or CUTL.TO?
CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BLOV.TO or CUTL.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged, analysts believe Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is more attractive than CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF0 0 0 CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is BLOV.TO or CUTL.TO More Risky?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLOV.TO or CUTL.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged offers a yield of 7.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLOV.TO or CUTL.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for CI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- CUTL.TOCI Utilities Giants Covered Call ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLOV.TO or PDF.TO?
Purpose Core Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Core Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- PDF.TOPurpose Core Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BLOV.TO or PDF.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Core Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Core Dividend ETF, analysts believe Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is more attractive than Purpose Core Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF0 0 0 PDF.TOPurpose Core Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is BLOV.TO or PDF.TO More Risky?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Core Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.806, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.353%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLOV.TO or PDF.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Purpose Core Dividend ETF offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Core Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLOV.TO or PDF.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Core Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Core Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Core Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Core Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- PDF.TOPurpose Core Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLOV.TO or PDIV.TO?
Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- PDIV.TOPurpose Enhanced Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BLOV.TO or PDIV.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF, analysts believe Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is more attractive than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF0 0 0 PDIV.TOPurpose Enhanced Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is BLOV.TO or PDIV.TO More Risky?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.763%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLOV.TO or PDIV.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF offers a yield of 12.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLOV.TO or PDIV.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Enhanced Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- PDIV.TOPurpose Enhanced Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLOV.TO or VVO.TO?
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BLOV.TO or VVO.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF, analysts believe Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF0 0 0 VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is BLOV.TO or VVO.TO More Risky?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.217%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLOV.TO or VVO.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLOV.TO or VVO.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLOV.TO or WSRI.TO?
Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net margin of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's return on equity of -- beat Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- WSRI.TOWealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BLOV.TO or WSRI.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has higher upside potential than Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF, analysts believe Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is more attractive than Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF0 0 0 WSRI.TOWealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is BLOV.TO or WSRI.TO More Risky?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.403% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.748%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLOV.TO or WSRI.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLOV.TO or WSRI.TO?
Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's net income of -- is lower than Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF is -- versus -- for Wealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLOV.TOBrompton NA Low Volatility Dividend ETF-- -- -- -- WSRI.TOWealthsimple North America Socially Resp Idx ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
45
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Buy
75
AFRM alert for Dec 17
Affirm Holdings, Inc. [AFRM] is up 11.77% over the past day.
