Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
62
QINF.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$158.23
Seasonality move
:
-0.17%
Day range:
$156.37 - $157.03
52-week range:
$133.04 - $163.89
Dividend yield:
2.49%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
512
Avg. volume:
1.3K
1-year change:
12.5%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRQ.NO
iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWO.NO
iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RIIN.TO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
$156.59 | -- | -- | -- | $1.01 | 2.49% | -- |
|
CRQ.NO
iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CWO.NO
iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RIIN.TO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
|
$22.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.69 | 6.91% | -- |
|
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
|
$51.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 2.71% | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
$33.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 1.89% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | 0.300 | -- | -- |
|
CRQ.NO
iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CWO.NO
iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RIIN.TO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 0.401 | -- | -- |
|
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
|
-- | 0.885 | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | 0.226 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QINF.TO
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRQ.NO
iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWO.NO
iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RIIN.TO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XCV.TO
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns QINF.TO or CRQ.NO?
iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- CRQ.NOiShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QINF.TO or CRQ.NO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm, analysts believe Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 CRQ.NOiShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm0 0 0 -
Is QINF.TO or CRQ.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QINF.TO or CRQ.NO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QINF.TO or CRQ.NO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -- CRQ.NOiShares Canadian Fundamental ETF Comm-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QINF.TO or CWO.NO?
iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- CWO.NOiShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QINF.TO or CWO.NO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm, analysts believe Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 CWO.NOiShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm0 0 0 -
Is QINF.TO or CWO.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QINF.TO or CWO.NO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QINF.TO or CWO.NO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -- CWO.NOiShares Emerging Markets Fdmtl ETF Comm-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QINF.TO or RIIN.TO?
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- RIIN.TORussell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QINF.TO or RIIN.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has higher upside potential than Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is more attractive than Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 RIIN.TORussell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is QINF.TO or RIIN.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.902%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QINF.TO or RIIN.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 6.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QINF.TO or RIIN.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is -- versus -- for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -- RIIN.TORussell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QINF.TO or XCV.TO?
iShares Canadian Value Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Canadian Value Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- XCV.TOiShares Canadian Value Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QINF.TO or XCV.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Canadian Value Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Canadian Value Index ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Canadian Value Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 XCV.TOiShares Canadian Value Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is QINF.TO or XCV.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Canadian Value Index ETF has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.353%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QINF.TO or XCV.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. iShares Canadian Value Index ETF offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Canadian Value Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QINF.TO or XCV.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Canadian Value Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Canadian Value Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Canadian Value Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Canadian Value Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -- XCV.TOiShares Canadian Value Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns QINF.TO or XMY.TO?
iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About QINF.TO or XMY.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged), analysts believe Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF0 0 0 XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)0 0 0 -
Is QINF.TO or XMY.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.011%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock QINF.TO or XMY.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios QINF.TO or XMY.TO?
Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged) quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income QINF.TOMackenzie Global Infrastructure Index ETF-- -- -- -- XMY.TOiShares MSCI Min Vol Glo Idx ETF (CAD-Hedged)-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 9
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.
Buy
58
KRUS alert for Jan 9
Kura Sushi USA, Inc. [KRUS] is up 6.41% over the past day.
Buy
53
PBF alert for Jan 9
PBF Energy, Inc. [PBF] is up 1.96% over the past day.
