Financhill
Sell
30

BYL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.25
Seasonality move :
-0.86%
Day range:
$0.24 - $0.25
52-week range:
$0.20 - $0.63
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.46x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
100.9K
Avg. volume:
79.2K
1-year change:
-40%
Market cap:
$36.6M
Revenue:
$83.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BYL.TO
Baylin Technologies, Inc.
$20.3M -- -17.28% -100% $0.35
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
$125.6M $0.18 1.22% -15.47% $14.38
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
$71M -$0.04 -13.03% -68.38% $11.30
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BYL.TO
Baylin Technologies, Inc.
$0.24 $0.35 $36.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.46x
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
$0.78 -- $84.9M -- $0.00 0% --
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
$13.78 $14.38 $1B 16.40x $1.21 5.84% 2.07x
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
$2.63 -- $1.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.15x
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
$6.92 $11.30 $229.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.73x
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
$0.02 -- $2.2M -- $0.00 0% 2.63x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BYL.TO
Baylin Technologies, Inc.
152.65% -0.192 65.68% 0.44x
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
66.47% 20.625 4.81% 0.03x
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
5.78% 0.785 1.69% 1.00x
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
344.39% -1.441 873.45% 0.12x
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
16.75% -0.313 30.57% 0.62x
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
4.95% 6.133 1.63% 0.49x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BYL.TO
Baylin Technologies, Inc.
$7.3M -$312K -33.46% -- -1.86% -$124K
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
-- -$383.2K -20.36% -37.41% -273.78% -$418.4K
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
$75.8M $19.9M 22.44% 24.01% 15% -$12M
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
$374.5K -$1.9M -94.23% -- -295.25% $433.9K
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
$37.1M -$2.3M -1.71% -2.13% -3.25% $4.4M
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
-$30.8K -$216.4K -4910.89% -- -124.51% -$188.8K

Baylin Technologies, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BYL.TO or CTTT.CX?

    Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -6.57% compared to Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -132.05%. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -37.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    43.42% -$0.01 $18.7M
    CTTT.CX
    Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
    -- -$0.00 $2.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About BYL.TO or CTTT.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baylin Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Baylin Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
    CTTT.CX
    Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BYL.TO or CTTT.CX More Risky?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, which suggesting that the stock is 58.285% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BYL.TO or CTTT.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baylin Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BYL.TO or CTTT.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -$450.6K. Notably, Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baylin Technologies, Inc. is 0.46x versus -- for Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0.46x -- $16.8M -$1.1M
    CTTT.CX
    Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
    -- -- -- -$450.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns BYL.TO or ET.TO?

    Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -6.57% compared to Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    43.42% -$0.01 $18.7M
    ET.TO
    Evertz Technologies Ltd.
    57.09% $0.24 $287.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About BYL.TO or ET.TO?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Evertz Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.38 which suggests that it could grow by 4.32%. Given that Baylin Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Evertz Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Baylin Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Evertz Technologies Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
    ET.TO
    Evertz Technologies Ltd.
    2 1 0
  • Is BYL.TO or ET.TO More Risky?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, which suggesting that the stock is 58.285% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.27%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BYL.TO or ET.TO?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evertz Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Baylin Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays out 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BYL.TO or ET.TO?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are smaller than Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $132.7M. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baylin Technologies, Inc. is 0.46x versus 2.07x for Evertz Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0.46x -- $16.8M -$1.1M
    ET.TO
    Evertz Technologies Ltd.
    2.07x 16.40x $132.7M $18.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns BYL.TO or NUR.CX?

    NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has a net margin of -6.57% compared to Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -494.76%. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    43.42% -$0.01 $18.7M
    NUR.CX
    NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
    59.67% -$10.36 $6.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About BYL.TO or NUR.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baylin Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than NuRAN Wireless, Inc., analysts believe Baylin Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than NuRAN Wireless, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
    NUR.CX
    NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BYL.TO or NUR.CX More Risky?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, which suggesting that the stock is 58.285% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has a beta of 4.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 303.248%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BYL.TO or NUR.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuRAN Wireless, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baylin Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuRAN Wireless, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BYL.TO or NUR.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than NuRAN Wireless, Inc. quarterly revenues of $627.6K. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baylin Technologies, Inc. is 0.46x versus 0.15x for NuRAN Wireless, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0.46x -- $16.8M -$1.1M
    NUR.CX
    NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
    0.15x -- $627.6K -$3.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns BYL.TO or STC.TO?

    Sangoma Technologies Corp. has a net margin of -6.57% compared to Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -4.6%. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -2.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    43.42% -$0.01 $18.7M
    STC.TO
    Sangoma Technologies Corp.
    53.01% -$0.10 $420.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About BYL.TO or STC.TO?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Sangoma Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $11.30 which suggests that it could grow by 63.24%. Given that Sangoma Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Baylin Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Sangoma Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Baylin Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
    STC.TO
    Sangoma Technologies Corp.
    5 0 0
  • Is BYL.TO or STC.TO More Risky?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, which suggesting that the stock is 58.285% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sangoma Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.776%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BYL.TO or STC.TO?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sangoma Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baylin Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sangoma Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BYL.TO or STC.TO?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are smaller than Sangoma Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $70M. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baylin Technologies, Inc. is 0.46x versus 0.73x for Sangoma Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0.46x -- $16.8M -$1.1M
    STC.TO
    Sangoma Technologies Corp.
    0.73x -- $70M -$3.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns BYL.TO or VTI.CX?

    Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a net margin of -6.57% compared to Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of -126.06%. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    43.42% -$0.01 $18.7M
    VTI.CX
    Valdor Technology International, Inc.
    -17.72% -$0.00 $27.2K
  • What do Analysts Say About BYL.TO or VTI.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.35, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Valdor Technology International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Baylin Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Valdor Technology International, Inc., analysts believe Baylin Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Valdor Technology International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
    VTI.CX
    Valdor Technology International, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is BYL.TO or VTI.CX More Risky?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, which suggesting that the stock is 58.285% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.861%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BYL.TO or VTI.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valdor Technology International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baylin Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valdor Technology International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BYL.TO or VTI.CX?

    Baylin Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Valdor Technology International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $173.8K. Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net income of -$219.1K. Notably, Baylin Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baylin Technologies, Inc. is 0.46x versus 2.63x for Valdor Technology International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BYL.TO
    Baylin Technologies, Inc.
    0.46x -- $16.8M -$1.1M
    VTI.CX
    Valdor Technology International, Inc.
    2.63x -- $173.8K -$219.1K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock