Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
52
ET.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.52
Seasonality move
:
1.63%
Day range:
$14.56 - $15.16
52-week range:
$9.45 - $15.16
Dividend yield:
5.49%
P/E ratio:
17.33x
P/S ratio:
2.19x
P/B ratio:
4.10x
Volume:
44.2K
Avg. volume:
26.1K
1-year change:
16.84%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$501.6M
EPS (TTM):
$0.84
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
|
$125.6M | $0.18 | 1.22% | -15.47% | $14.38 |
|
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QTRH.TO
Quarterhill, Inc.
|
$57.5M | -$0.03 | 2.43% | -79.03% | $1.84 |
|
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
|
$71M | -$0.04 | -13.03% | -68.38% | $11.22 |
|
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
|
$14.57 | $14.38 | $1.1B | 17.33x | $0.20 | 5.49% | 2.19x |
|
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
|
$0.72 | -- | $78.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
|
$3.50 | -- | $1.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
QTRH.TO
Quarterhill, Inc.
|
$1.02 | $1.84 | $119.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.55x |
|
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
|
$7.49 | $11.22 | $248.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.79x |
|
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
|
$0.02 | -- | $2.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.63x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
|
5.78% | 0.785 | 1.69% | 1.00x |
|
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
|
66.47% | 20.625 | 4.81% | 0.03x |
|
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
|
344.39% | -1.441 | 873.45% | 0.12x |
|
QTRH.TO
Quarterhill, Inc.
|
33.88% | -0.467 | 67.07% | 0.86x |
|
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
|
16.75% | -0.313 | 30.57% | 0.62x |
|
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
|
4.95% | 6.133 | 1.63% | 0.49x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET.TO
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
|
$75.8M | $19.9M | 22.44% | 24.01% | 15% | -$12M |
|
CTTT.CX
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -$383.2K | -20.36% | -37.41% | -273.78% | -$418.4K |
|
NUR.CX
NuRAN Wireless, Inc.
|
$374.5K | -$1.9M | -94.23% | -- | -295.25% | $433.9K |
|
QTRH.TO
Quarterhill, Inc.
|
$10.5M | -$3.8M | -10.58% | -15.82% | -6.97% | $7.7M |
|
STC.TO
Sangoma Technologies Corp.
|
$37.1M | -$2.3M | -1.71% | -2.13% | -3.25% | $4.4M |
|
VTI.CX
Valdor Technology International, Inc.
|
-$30.8K | -$216.4K | -4910.89% | -- | -124.51% | -$188.8K |
Evertz Technologies Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ET.TO or CTTT.CX?
Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -132.05%. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01% beat Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -37.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.57.09% $0.24 $287.5M CTTT.CXCritical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.-- -$0.00 $2.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ET.TO or CTTT.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.38, signalling downside risk potential of -1.34%. On the other hand Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evertz Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Evertz Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2 1 0 CTTT.CXCritical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ET.TO or CTTT.CX More Risky?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, which suggesting that the stock is 33.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET.TO or CTTT.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET.TO or CTTT.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -$450.6K. Notably, Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evertz Technologies Ltd. is 2.19x versus -- for Critical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2.19x 17.33x $132.7M $18.6M CTTT.CXCritical Infrastructure Technologies Ltd.-- -- -- -$450.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns ET.TO or NUR.CX?
NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -494.76%. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01% beat NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.57.09% $0.24 $287.5M NUR.CXNuRAN Wireless, Inc.59.67% -$10.36 $6.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ET.TO or NUR.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.38, signalling downside risk potential of -1.34%. On the other hand NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evertz Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than NuRAN Wireless, Inc., analysts believe Evertz Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than NuRAN Wireless, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2 1 0 NUR.CXNuRAN Wireless, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ET.TO or NUR.CX More Risky?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, which suggesting that the stock is 33.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has a beta of 4.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 303.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET.TO or NUR.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. NuRAN Wireless, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. NuRAN Wireless, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET.TO or NUR.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than NuRAN Wireless, Inc. quarterly revenues of $627.6K. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evertz Technologies Ltd. is 2.19x versus 0.20x for NuRAN Wireless, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2.19x 17.33x $132.7M $18.6M NUR.CXNuRAN Wireless, Inc.0.20x -- $627.6K -$3.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns ET.TO or QTRH.TO?
Quarterhill, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -11.91%. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01% beat Quarterhill, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.57.09% $0.24 $287.5M QTRH.TOQuarterhill, Inc.19.23% -$0.06 $243.4M -
What do Analysts Say About ET.TO or QTRH.TO?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.38, signalling downside risk potential of -1.34%. On the other hand Quarterhill, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.84 which suggests that it could grow by 80.6%. Given that Quarterhill, Inc. has higher upside potential than Evertz Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Quarterhill, Inc. is more attractive than Evertz Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2 1 0 QTRH.TOQuarterhill, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is ET.TO or QTRH.TO More Risky?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, which suggesting that the stock is 33.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quarterhill, Inc. has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.591%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET.TO or QTRH.TO?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Quarterhill, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Quarterhill, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET.TO or QTRH.TO?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than Quarterhill, Inc. quarterly revenues of $54.7M. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Quarterhill, Inc.'s net income of -$6.5M. Notably, Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Quarterhill, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evertz Technologies Ltd. is 2.19x versus 0.55x for Quarterhill, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2.19x 17.33x $132.7M $18.6M QTRH.TOQuarterhill, Inc.0.55x -- $54.7M -$6.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns ET.TO or STC.TO?
Sangoma Technologies Corp. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -4.6%. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01% beat Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -2.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.57.09% $0.24 $287.5M STC.TOSangoma Technologies Corp.53.01% -$0.10 $420.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ET.TO or STC.TO?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.38, signalling downside risk potential of -1.34%. On the other hand Sangoma Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $11.22 which suggests that it could grow by 52.12%. Given that Sangoma Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Evertz Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Sangoma Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Evertz Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2 1 0 STC.TOSangoma Technologies Corp.5 0 0 -
Is ET.TO or STC.TO More Risky?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, which suggesting that the stock is 33.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sangoma Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.776%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET.TO or STC.TO?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Sangoma Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sangoma Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET.TO or STC.TO?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than Sangoma Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $70M. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evertz Technologies Ltd. is 2.19x versus 0.79x for Sangoma Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2.19x 17.33x $132.7M $18.6M STC.TOSangoma Technologies Corp.0.79x -- $70M -$3.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns ET.TO or VTI.CX?
Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net margin of -126.06%. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01% beat Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.57.09% $0.24 $287.5M VTI.CXValdor Technology International, Inc.-17.72% -$0.00 $27.2K -
What do Analysts Say About ET.TO or VTI.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.38, signalling downside risk potential of -1.34%. On the other hand Valdor Technology International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evertz Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Valdor Technology International, Inc., analysts believe Evertz Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Valdor Technology International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2 1 0 VTI.CXValdor Technology International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ET.TO or VTI.CX More Risky?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, which suggesting that the stock is 33.27% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.861%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET.TO or VTI.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.49%. Valdor Technology International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Valdor Technology International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET.TO or VTI.CX?
Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues are $132.7M, which are larger than Valdor Technology International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $173.8K. Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net income of -$219.1K. Notably, Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.33x while Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evertz Technologies Ltd. is 2.19x versus 2.63x for Valdor Technology International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ET.TOEvertz Technologies Ltd.2.19x 17.33x $132.7M $18.6M VTI.CXValdor Technology International, Inc.2.63x -- $173.8K -$219.1K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 3.51% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.79% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
