VTI.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -126.06% compared to Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net margin of 14.03%. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.01%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evertz Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.38 which suggests that it could fall by -1.34%. Given that Evertz Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Valdor Technology International, Inc., analysts believe Evertz Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Valdor Technology International, Inc..

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evertz Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.27%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evertz Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Valdor Technology International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evertz Technologies Ltd. pays out 101.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $173.8K, which are smaller than Evertz Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $132.7M. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net income of -$219.1K is lower than Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evertz Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valdor Technology International, Inc. is 2.63x versus 2.19x for Evertz Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has a net margin of -126.06% compared to Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net margin of -494.76%. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Valdor Technology International, Inc. has higher upside potential than NuRAN Wireless, Inc., analysts believe Valdor Technology International, Inc. is more attractive than NuRAN Wireless, Inc..

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuRAN Wireless, Inc. has a beta of 4.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 303.248%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuRAN Wireless, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valdor Technology International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuRAN Wireless, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $173.8K, which are smaller than NuRAN Wireless, Inc. quarterly revenues of $627.6K. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net income of -$219.1K is higher than NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuRAN Wireless, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valdor Technology International, Inc. is 2.63x versus 0.20x for NuRAN Wireless, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quarterhill, Inc. has a net margin of -126.06% compared to Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net margin of -11.91%. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Quarterhill, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.82%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quarterhill, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.84 which suggests that it could grow by 80.6%. Given that Quarterhill, Inc. has higher upside potential than Valdor Technology International, Inc., analysts believe Quarterhill, Inc. is more attractive than Valdor Technology International, Inc..

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quarterhill, Inc. has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.591%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quarterhill, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valdor Technology International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quarterhill, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $173.8K, which are smaller than Quarterhill, Inc. quarterly revenues of $54.7M. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net income of -$219.1K is higher than Quarterhill, Inc.'s net income of -$6.5M. Notably, Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quarterhill, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valdor Technology International, Inc. is 2.63x versus 0.55x for Quarterhill, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sangoma Technologies Corp. has a net margin of -126.06% compared to Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net margin of -4.6%. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -2.13%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sangoma Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $11.22 which suggests that it could grow by 52.12%. Given that Sangoma Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Valdor Technology International, Inc., analysts believe Sangoma Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Valdor Technology International, Inc..

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, which suggesting that the stock is 24.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sangoma Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.776%.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sangoma Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valdor Technology International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sangoma Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valdor Technology International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $173.8K, which are smaller than Sangoma Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $70M. Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s net income of -$219.1K is higher than Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Valdor Technology International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sangoma Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valdor Technology International, Inc. is 2.63x versus 0.79x for Sangoma Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.