WMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DT Midstream, Inc. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 35.96%. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61% beat DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.43%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $75.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand DT Midstream, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $130.57 which suggests that it could fall by -4.93%. Given that The Williams Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe The Williams Cos., Inc. is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. DT Midstream, Inc. offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream, Inc. pays out 76.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues of $317M. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M is higher than DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $114M. Notably, The Williams Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.49x while DT Midstream, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Williams Cos., Inc. is 7.51x versus 11.23x for DT Midstream, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Excelerate Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 14.08%. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61% beat Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.66%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $75.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.08 which suggests that it could fall by -9.65%. Given that The Williams Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than Excelerate Energy, Inc., analysts believe The Williams Cos., Inc. is more attractive than Excelerate Energy, Inc..

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Excelerate Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy, Inc. pays out 10.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Excelerate Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $391M. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M is higher than Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s net income of $55M. Notably, The Williams Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.49x while Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Williams Cos., Inc. is 7.51x versus 2.48x for Excelerate Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 24.17% compared to The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 4.89%. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $75.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.71 which suggests that it could grow by 14.53%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than The Williams Cos., Inc., analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than The Williams Cos., Inc..

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.461%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 108.73% of its earnings as a dividend. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $25.3B. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B. Notably, The Williams Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.49x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Williams Cos., Inc. is 7.51x versus 0.77x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 24.17% compared to The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 29.78%. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61% beat Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.17%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $75.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.47%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $264.38 which suggests that it could grow by 16.74%. Given that Cheniere Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Williams Cos., Inc., analysts believe Cheniere Energy, Inc. is more attractive than The Williams Cos., Inc..

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.349% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.729%.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Cheniere Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy, Inc. pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M is lower than Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, The Williams Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.49x while Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Williams Cos., Inc. is 7.51x versus 2.69x for Cheniere Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.