WMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EnLink Midstream LLC has a net margin of 26.61% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 0.88%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 19.5% beat EnLink Midstream LLC's return on equity of 5.38%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $55.58, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand EnLink Midstream LLC has an analysts' consensus of $15.36 which suggests that it could grow by 9.04%. Given that EnLink Midstream LLC has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe EnLink Midstream LLC is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnLink Midstream LLC has a beta of 2.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 143.57%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. EnLink Midstream LLC offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Williams Companies pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. EnLink Midstream LLC pays out 114.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EnLink Midstream LLC's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than EnLink Midstream LLC quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Williams Companies's net income of $706M is higher than EnLink Midstream LLC's net income of $14M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.67x while EnLink Midstream LLC's PE ratio is 67.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.20x versus 0.97x for EnLink Midstream LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 26.61% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 5.7%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 19.5% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $55.58, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.26 which suggests that it could grow by 12.73%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.053%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 6.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Williams Companies pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Williams Companies's net income of $706M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.67x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.20x versus 0.76x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 26.61% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 16.9%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 19.5% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.01%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $55.58, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $26.53 which suggests that it could fall by -1.21%. Given that Williams Companies has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Williams Companies is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Williams Companies has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.441%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Williams Companies pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 105.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kinder Morgan's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Williams Companies's net income of $706M is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $625M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.67x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.20x versus 3.94x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 26.61% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 23.73%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 19.5% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 42.31%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $55.58, signalling upside risk potential of 3.92%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $229.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.63%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.517%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.55%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Williams Companies pays 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Williams Companies's net income of $706M is lower than Cheniere Energy's net income of $893M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.67x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.20x versus 3.02x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.