Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
55
ET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.98
Seasonality move
:
10.79%
Day range:
$18.80 - $19.07
52-week range:
$14.60 - $20.12
Dividend yield:
7.01%
P/E ratio:
15.66x
P/S ratio:
0.76x
P/B ratio:
2.09x
Volume:
19.1M
Avg. volume:
16.9M
1-year change:
-6.06%
Market cap:
$64.9B
Revenue:
$85.5B
EPS (TTM):
$1.21
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET
Energy Transfer LP
|
$24B | $0.30 | 14.8% | 2.86% | $21.74 |
|
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
|
$2.8B | $1.11 | -9.46% | 17.22% | $55.27 |
|
EE
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
|
$303.6M | $0.36 | 10.58% | 334.86% | $38.08 |
|
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline LP
|
$11.9B | $0.50 | -1.69% | -0.07% | $21.18 |
|
VG
Vonage Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WMB
The Williams Cos., Inc.
|
$3.2B | $0.57 | 0.35% | -0.96% | $75.18 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET
Energy Transfer LP
|
$18.90 | $21.74 | $64.9B | 15.66x | $0.34 | 7.01% | 0.76x |
|
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
|
$59.32 | $55.27 | $28.7B | 15.40x | $0.83 | 5.23% | 2.79x |
|
EE
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
|
$41.93 | $38.08 | $1.3B | 53.57x | $0.08 | 0.67% | 2.46x |
|
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline LP
|
$20.70 | $21.18 | $14.6B | 12.31x | $0.42 | 7.52% | 0.33x |
|
VG
Vonage Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
WMB
The Williams Cos., Inc.
|
$72.17 | $75.18 | $88.2B | 46.96x | $0.50 | 2.77% | 7.43x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET
Energy Transfer LP
|
67.01% | 0.946 | 93.27% | 0.00x |
|
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
|
86.54% | -0.160 | 63.06% | 0.41x |
|
EE
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
|
68.2% | 1.065 | 62.29% | 2.02x |
|
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline LP
|
52.56% | 0.303 | 68.48% | 0.00x |
|
VG
Vonage Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
WMB
The Williams Cos., Inc.
|
69.63% | 0.048 | 38.8% | 0.69x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ET
Energy Transfer LP
|
$2.7B | $2.4B | 5.17% | 12.13% | 9.29% | $1.3B |
|
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
|
$617M | $591M | 13.03% | -- | 24.58% | $610M |
|
EE
Excelerate Energy, Inc.
|
$112.9M | $89.4M | 5.78% | 8.66% | 22.87% | $62.9M |
|
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline LP
|
$456M | $364M | 6.8% | 11.66% | 3.45% | $786M |
|
VG
Vonage Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WMB
The Williams Cos., Inc.
|
$1.5B | $1.3B | 6.44% | 18.61% | 40.87% | -$485M |
Energy Transfer LP vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ET or CQP?
Cheniere Energy Partners LP has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 16.56%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13% beat Cheniere Energy Partners LP's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ETEnergy Transfer LP10.74% $0.25 $119.1B CQPCheniere Energy Partners LP25.67% $0.80 $14.4B -
What do Analysts Say About ET or CQP?
Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $55.27 which suggests that it could fall by -6.83%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy Partners LP, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Cheniere Energy Partners LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ETEnergy Transfer LP12 3 0 CQPCheniere Energy Partners LP0 7 4 -
Is ET or CQP More Risky?
Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.461% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or CQP?
Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Cheniere Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 5.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 108.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy Partners LP pays out 81.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy Partners LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or CQP?
Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $25.3B, which are larger than Cheniere Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Cheniere Energy Partners LP's net income of $398M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.66x while Cheniere Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is 15.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 2.79x for Cheniere Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ETEnergy Transfer LP0.76x 15.66x $25.3B $1.2B CQPCheniere Energy Partners LP2.79x 15.40x $2.4B $398M
-
Which has Higher Returns ET or EE?
Excelerate Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 14.08%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13% beat Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.66%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ETEnergy Transfer LP10.74% $0.25 $119.1B EEExcelerate Energy, Inc.28.87% $0.43 $3.6B -
What do Analysts Say About ET or EE?
Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.08 which suggests that it could fall by -9.17%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Excelerate Energy, Inc., analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Excelerate Energy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ETEnergy Transfer LP12 3 0 EEExcelerate Energy, Inc.7 4 0 -
Is ET or EE More Risky?
Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.461% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or EE?
Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Excelerate Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 108.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy, Inc. pays out 10.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or EE?
Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $25.3B, which are larger than Excelerate Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $391M. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s net income of $55M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.66x while Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 2.46x for Excelerate Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ETEnergy Transfer LP0.76x 15.66x $25.3B $1.2B EEExcelerate Energy, Inc.2.46x 53.57x $391M $55M
-
Which has Higher Returns ET or PAA?
Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 3.08%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 11.66%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ETEnergy Transfer LP10.74% $0.25 $119.1B PAAPlains All American Pipeline LP4.32% $0.41 $24B -
What do Analysts Say About ET or PAA?
Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.18 which suggests that it could grow by 2.3%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ETEnergy Transfer LP12 3 0 PAAPlains All American Pipeline LP6 7 1 -
Is ET or PAA More Risky?
Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.461% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or PAA?
Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 7.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 108.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 91.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or PAA?
Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $25.3B, which are larger than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $10.6B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $325M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.66x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 12.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 0.33x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ETEnergy Transfer LP0.76x 15.66x $25.3B $1.2B PAAPlains All American Pipeline LP0.33x 12.31x $10.6B $325M
-
Which has Higher Returns ET or VG?
Vonage Holdings has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of --. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13% beat Vonage Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ETEnergy Transfer LP10.74% $0.25 $119.1B VGVonage Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ET or VG?
Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Vonage Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Vonage Holdings, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Vonage Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ETEnergy Transfer LP12 3 0 VGVonage Holdings0 0 0 -
Is ET or VG More Risky?
Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.461% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vonage Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or VG?
Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. Vonage Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 108.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Vonage Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or VG?
Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $25.3B, which are larger than Vonage Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than Vonage Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.66x while Vonage Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus -- for Vonage Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ETEnergy Transfer LP0.76x 15.66x $25.3B $1.2B VGVonage Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ET or WMB?
The Williams Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 24.17%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13% beat The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ETEnergy Transfer LP10.74% $0.25 $119.1B WMBThe Williams Cos., Inc.46.84% -- $44.4B -
What do Analysts Say About ET or WMB?
Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $21.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand The Williams Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.18 which suggests that it could grow by 4.17%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than The Williams Cos., Inc., analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than The Williams Cos., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ETEnergy Transfer LP12 3 0 WMBThe Williams Cos., Inc.13 5 0 -
Is ET or WMB More Risky?
Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.461% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.349%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ET or WMB?
Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.01%. The Williams Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 108.68% of its earnings as a dividend. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays out 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. The Williams Cos., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ET or WMB?
Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $25.3B, which are larger than The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B is higher than The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.66x while The Williams Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.76x versus 7.43x for The Williams Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ETEnergy Transfer LP0.76x 15.66x $25.3B $1.2B WMBThe Williams Cos., Inc.7.43x 46.96x $3.2B $773M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
23
CAR alert for Feb 20
Avis Budget Group, Inc. [CAR] is down 0.3% over the past day.
Buy
75
HYMC alert for Feb 20
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is down 2.47% over the past day.
Sell
1
EPAM alert for Feb 20
EPAM Systems, Inc. [EPAM] is down 0.11% over the past day.
