DTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 37.58% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of 6.48%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.83% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.72%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $120.85, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.55 which suggests that it could grow by 28.27%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.007%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 81.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 99.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $20B. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $118M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.3B. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 10.56x versus 0.73x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 37.58% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of 29.78%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.83% beat Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.17%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $120.85, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $272.27 which suggests that it could grow by 30.61%. Given that Cheniere Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe Cheniere Energy, Inc. is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.891%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Cheniere Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 81.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy, Inc. pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $118M is lower than Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 10.56x versus 2.48x for Cheniere Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 37.58% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of -89.61%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.83% beat New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -77.36%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $120.85, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 201.93%. Given that New Fortress Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe New Fortress Energy, Inc. is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.632%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. New Fortress Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 81.72% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy, Inc. pays out 26.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314M, which are smaller than New Fortress Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $327.4M. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $118M is higher than New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$293.4M. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 10.56x versus 0.20x for New Fortress Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 37.58% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of 23.82%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.83% beat The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 16.92%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $120.85, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand The Williams Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.70 which suggests that it could grow by 9.99%. Given that The Williams Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe The Williams Cos., Inc. is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.293%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. The Williams Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 81.72% of its earnings as a dividend. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays out 104.57% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Williams Cos., Inc.'s is not.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314M, which are smaller than The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $118M is lower than The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $683M. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while The Williams Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 10.56x versus 6.52x for The Williams Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.