DTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 35.96% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of 4.89%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.43% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $129.36, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.74 which suggests that it could grow by 14.53%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.461%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 76.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 108.73% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $317M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $25.3B. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $114M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.64x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 11.23x versus 0.77x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 35.96% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of 29.78%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.43% beat Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.17%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $129.36, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $264.29 which suggests that it could grow by 16.74%. Given that Cheniere Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe Cheniere Energy, Inc. is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.729%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Cheniere Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 76.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy, Inc. pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $317M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $114M is lower than Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.64x while Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 11.23x versus 2.69x for Cheniere Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 35.96% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of --. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.43% beat Empire Diversified Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $129.36, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DT Midstream, Inc. has higher upside potential than Empire Diversified Energy, Inc., analysts believe DT Midstream, Inc. is more attractive than Empire Diversified Energy, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. has a beta of 2.647, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.654%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 76.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $317M, which are larger than Empire Diversified Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $114M is higher than Empire Diversified Energy, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.64x while Empire Diversified Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 11.23x versus 12.39x for Empire Diversified Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 35.96% compared to DT Midstream, Inc.'s net margin of 24.17%. DT Midstream, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.43% beat The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a consensus price target of $129.36, signalling downside risk potential of -4.93%. On the other hand The Williams Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.18 which suggests that it could grow by 4.17%. Given that The Williams Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, Inc., analysts believe The Williams Cos., Inc. is more attractive than DT Midstream, Inc..

DT Midstream, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.349%.

DT Midstream, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. The Williams Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. DT Midstream, Inc. pays 76.24% of its earnings as a dividend. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays out 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DT Midstream, Inc. quarterly revenues are $317M, which are smaller than The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. DT Midstream, Inc.'s net income of $114M is lower than The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M. Notably, DT Midstream, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.64x while The Williams Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DT Midstream, Inc. is 11.23x versus 7.43x for The Williams Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.