VRSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of -11.03%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.96%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.67%. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Castellum.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.12x versus 1.65x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 11.54%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.57%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.96%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $84.78 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.657%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 27.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5B. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $582M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.12x versus 2.05x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 4.19%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.96%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 33.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.12x versus 16.38x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of --. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.96%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.98%. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.917, which suggesting that the stock is 8.279% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.12x versus 10.02x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.