VFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hanesbrands has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of -1.24%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -230.99%.

VF has a consensus price target of $21.12, signalling upside risk potential of 59.02%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of $7.23 which suggests that it could grow by 42.3%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.285%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $760.1M. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Hanesbrands's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.50x versus 0.52x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Movado Group has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 3.84%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.66%.

VF has a consensus price target of $21.12, signalling upside risk potential of 59.02%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 106.97%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.284%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Movado Group offers a yield of 9.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $174.7M. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Movado Group's net income of $6.7M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Movado Group's PE ratio is 17.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.50x versus 0.53x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 13.88%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

VF has a consensus price target of $21.12, signalling upside risk potential of 59.02%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $269.84 which suggests that it could grow by 8.48%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.445, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.509%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. VF's net income of $167.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 22.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.50x versus 2.31x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 0.09%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

VF has a consensus price target of $21.12, signalling upside risk potential of 59.02%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $8.10 which suggests that it could grow by 38.61%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

VF has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.812%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.50x versus 0.48x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.