V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 47.71% compared to Visa's net margin of 3.23%. Visa's return on equity of 50.81% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $382.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.59%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $290.82 which suggests that it could fall by -18.26%. Given that Visa has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Visa is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Visa has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Visa's net income of $4.6B is higher than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.07x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 66.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.05x versus 13.83x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Circle Internet Group has a net margin of 47.71% compared to Visa's net margin of 11.2%. Visa's return on equity of 50.81% beat Circle Internet Group's return on equity of --.

Visa has a consensus price target of $382.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.59%. On the other hand Circle Internet Group has an analysts' consensus of $204.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.08%. Given that Circle Internet Group has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Circle Internet Group is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Circle Internet Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Circle Internet Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Circle Internet Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than Circle Internet Group quarterly revenues of $578.6M. Visa's net income of $4.6B is higher than Circle Internet Group's net income of $64.8M. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.07x while Circle Internet Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.05x versus 38.34x for Circle Internet Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 47.71% compared to Visa's net margin of 45.24%. Visa's return on equity of 50.81% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $382.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.59%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $622.18 which suggests that it could grow by 9.3%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.368%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Visa's net income of $4.6B is higher than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.07x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 39.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.05x versus 18.05x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 47.71% compared to Visa's net margin of 16.52%. Visa's return on equity of 50.81% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

Visa has a consensus price target of $382.49, signalling upside risk potential of 6.59%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.94 which suggests that it could grow by 6.99%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Visa.

Visa has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.716% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.557%.

Visa has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visa pays 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visa quarterly revenues are $9.6B, which are larger than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Visa's net income of $4.6B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Visa's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.07x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visa is 19.05x versus 2.45x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.