HOOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hut 8 Corp. has a net margin of 43.37% compared to Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 60.89%. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.58% beat Hut 8 Corp.'s return on equity of 17.82%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $151.95, signalling upside risk potential of 28.63%. On the other hand Hut 8 Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $63.27 which suggests that it could grow by 27.45%. Given that Robinhood Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hut 8 Corp., analysts believe Robinhood Markets, Inc. is more attractive than Hut 8 Corp..

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 Corp. has a beta of 4.367, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 336.734%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Robinhood Markets, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Hut 8 Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.5M. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net income of $556M is higher than Hut 8 Corp.'s net income of $50.8M. Notably, Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Hut 8 Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinhood Markets, Inc. is 25.47x versus 30.84x for Hut 8 Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 43.37% compared to Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 42.59%. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.58% beat Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.42%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $151.95, signalling upside risk potential of 28.63%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.89%. Given that Robinhood Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., analysts believe Robinhood Markets, Inc. is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc..

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.76%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Robinhood Markets, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. pays out 12.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net income of $556M is lower than Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinhood Markets, Inc. is 25.47x versus 2.89x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard, Inc. has a net margin of 43.37% compared to Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 45.57%. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.58% beat Mastercard, Inc.'s return on equity of 195.2%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $151.95, signalling upside risk potential of 28.63%. On the other hand Mastercard, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $657.92 which suggests that it could grow by 13.51%. Given that Robinhood Markets, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mastercard, Inc., analysts believe Robinhood Markets, Inc. is more attractive than Mastercard, Inc..

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard, Inc. has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.331%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mastercard, Inc. offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Robinhood Markets, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard, Inc. pays out 19.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Mastercard, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net income of $556M is lower than Mastercard, Inc.'s net income of $3.9B. Notably, Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while Mastercard, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinhood Markets, Inc. is 25.47x versus 16.78x for Mastercard, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 43.37% compared to Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net margin of 48.78%. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.58% beat MARA Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.38%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a consensus price target of $151.95, signalling upside risk potential of 28.63%. On the other hand MARA Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.41 which suggests that it could grow by 133.72%. Given that MARA Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Robinhood Markets, Inc., analysts believe MARA Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Robinhood Markets, Inc..

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 5.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 442.356%.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Robinhood Markets, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Robinhood Markets, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s net income of $556M is higher than MARA Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $123.1M. Notably, Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 49.04x while MARA Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinhood Markets, Inc. is 25.47x versus 4.37x for MARA Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.