SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a net margin of 1.37% compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net margin of 18.43%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.17%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $242.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.92%. Given that Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., analysts believe Howmet Aerospace, Inc. is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc..

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace, Inc. has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.245%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.01%. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc. pays out 9.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Howmet Aerospace, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M is lower than Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s net income of $385M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while Howmet Aerospace, Inc.'s PE ratio is 61.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is 0.82x versus 11.13x for Howmet Aerospace, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illinois Tool Works Inc. has a net margin of 1.37% compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net margin of 20.23%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s return on equity of 92.42%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Illinois Tool Works Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $259.59 which suggests that it could grow by 1.75%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Illinois Tool Works Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Illinois Tool Works Inc..

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illinois Tool Works Inc. has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.5%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.01%. Illinois Tool Works Inc. offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.61 per share. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Illinois Tool Works Inc. pays out 49.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than Illinois Tool Works Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M is lower than Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s net income of $821M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is 0.82x versus 4.72x for Illinois Tool Works Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal, Inc. has a net margin of 1.37% compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net margin of 4.95%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.67%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Kennametal, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.25 which suggests that it could fall by -17.83%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.112%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.01%. Kennametal, Inc. offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc. pays out 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues of $498M. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M is higher than Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while Kennametal, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is 0.82x versus 1.20x for Kennametal, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of 1.37% compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net margin of 5.33%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.22%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a consensus price target of $86.08, signalling upside risk potential of 4.53%. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 3.58%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Proto Labs, Inc..

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.84%.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.01%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.4M. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M is higher than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 89.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is 0.82x versus 2.56x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.