SHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of 5.5%. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.41%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $386.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.08%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $185.31 which suggests that it could grow by 3%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than Nucor Corp., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than Nucor Corp..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.125%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $423M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.77x versus 1.28x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of 7.95%. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.06%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $386.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.08%. On the other hand PPG Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $123.35 which suggests that it could grow by 5.74%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.164%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. PPG Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries, Inc. pays out 40.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $311M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while PPG Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.77x versus 1.67x for PPG Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of --. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $386.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.08%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could fall by -1.73%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.562%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.77x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of --. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $386.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.08%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 87.57%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than The Sherwin-Williams Co., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than The Sherwin-Williams Co..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.124%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 34.54x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.77x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.