SHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow, Inc. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of -15.63%. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat Dow, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.59%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $387.43, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand Dow, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.19 which suggests that it could fall by -4.37%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than Dow, Inc., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than Dow, Inc..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow, Inc. has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.009%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Dow, Inc. offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow, Inc. pays out 178.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow, Inc.'s is not.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Dow, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.5B. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than Dow, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5B. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while Dow, Inc.'s PE ratio is 62.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.83x versus 0.54x for Dow, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of 5.5%. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.41%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $387.43, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $186.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.37%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than Nucor Corp., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than Nucor Corp..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.776%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $423M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.83x versus 1.28x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of 7.95%. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat PPG Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.96%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $387.43, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand PPG Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $125.30 which suggests that it could fall by -0.97%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than PPG Industries, Inc., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than PPG Industries, Inc..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.597%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. PPG Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries, Inc. pays out 40.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than PPG Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than PPG Industries, Inc.'s net income of $311M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while PPG Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.83x versus 1.81x for PPG Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 8.52% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net margin of 5.99%. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s return on equity of 59.44% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a consensus price target of $387.43, signalling upside risk potential of 7.43%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.10 which suggests that it could fall by -0.15%. Given that The Sherwin-Williams Co. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe The Sherwin-Williams Co. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.358% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.217%.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. The Sherwin-Williams Co. pays 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Sherwin-Williams Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s net income of $476.8M is higher than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M. Notably, The Sherwin-Williams Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 35.15x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Sherwin-Williams Co. is 3.83x versus 1.58x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.