SHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 4.06%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 69.91% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.82%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.223% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $480.1M is higher than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.40x while Nucor's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.76x versus 1.03x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of -12.93%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 69.91% beat PPG Industries's return on equity of 14.3%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand PPG Industries has an analysts' consensus of $131.78 which suggests that it could grow by 16.14%. Given that PPG Industries has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe PPG Industries is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.223% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.973%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. PPG Industries offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries pays out 55.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than PPG Industries quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $480.1M is higher than PPG Industries's net income of -$280M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.40x while PPG Industries's PE ratio is 23.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.76x versus 1.68x for PPG Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of --. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 69.91% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 216.62%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.223% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $480.1M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.40x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.76x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPM International has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 9.93%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 69.91% beat RPM International's return on equity of 25.92%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $383.11, signalling upside risk potential of 12.09%. On the other hand RPM International has an analysts' consensus of $134.99 which suggests that it could grow by 16.2%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.223% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.257%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.86%. RPM International offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than RPM International quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $480.1M is higher than RPM International's net income of $183.2M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.40x while RPM International's PE ratio is 22.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.76x versus 2.03x for RPM International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.