SEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 31.49%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,238.12 which suggests that it could grow by 3.46%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.937%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $8.75 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $8B. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 34.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.92x versus 7.58x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 16.85%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $187.83 which suggests that it could fall by -0.54%. Given that Sealed Air has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Sealed Air is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.55%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 24.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.92x versus 1.95x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 10.93%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.05%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Sealed Air, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Sealed Air.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 210.572%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.92x versus 1.09x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 6.82% compared to Sealed Air's net margin of 7.33%. Sealed Air's return on equity of 66.5% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17%.

Sealed Air has a consensus price target of $41.83, signalling upside risk potential of 23.29%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $17.38 which suggests that it could grow by 23.63%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Sealed Air, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Sealed Air.

Sealed Air has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.357, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.698%.

Sealed Air has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air pays 34.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $532M. Sealed Air's net income of $91.7M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of $39M. Notably, Sealed Air's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.47x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 58.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air is 0.92x versus 1.14x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.