SEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of --. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.36, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is higher than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net income of -$54.8K. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.16x versus -- for Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 4.85%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.94%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.36, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.37%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Dream Finders Homes, Inc., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Dream Finders Homes, Inc..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a beta of 1.861, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.132%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Dream Finders Homes, Inc. quarterly revenues of $969.8M. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is higher than Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s net income of $47.1M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.16x versus 0.44x for Dream Finders Homes, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 5.98%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 52.69%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.36, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $281.59 which suggests that it could grow by 38.96%. Given that Expedia Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sealed Air Corp., analysts believe Expedia Group, Inc. is more attractive than Sealed Air Corp..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.49%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out 16.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $212M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.16x versus 1.80x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rollins, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 12.76%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.43%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.36, signalling upside risk potential of 8.13%. On the other hand Rollins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.66 which suggests that it could grow by 3.77%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.350, which suggesting that the stock is 34.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.36%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Rollins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc. pays out 62.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $912.9M. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is higher than Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $116.4M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Rollins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 56.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.16x versus 7.90x for Rollins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.