BDCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net margin of 4.85%. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.94%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp., analysts believe Dream Finders Homes, Inc. is more attractive than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp..

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a beta of 1.861, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.132%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dream Finders Homes, Inc. quarterly revenues of $969.8M. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net income of -$54.8K is lower than Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s net income of $47.1M. Notably, Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. is -- versus 0.42x for Dream Finders Homes, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net margin of 21.85%. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $289.47 which suggests that it could grow by 22.59%. Given that Expedia Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp., analysts believe Expedia Group, Inc. is more attractive than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp..

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.49%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net income of -$54.8K is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. is -- versus 2.18x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rollins, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net margin of 15.94%. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rollins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.28 which suggests that it could grow by 0.68%. Given that Rollins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp., analysts believe Rollins, Inc. is more attractive than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp..

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.36%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rollins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc. pays out 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net income of -$54.8K is lower than Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M. Notably, Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rollins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 60.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. is -- versus 8.54x for Rollins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sealed Air Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net margin of 13.74%. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sealed Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.02 which suggests that it could grow by 7.66%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp..

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.988%.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sealed Air Corp. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp. pays out 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net income of -$54.8K is lower than Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M. Notably, Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sealed Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. is -- versus 1.15x for Sealed Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.