ROL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avery Dennison Corp. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 7.33%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Avery Dennison Corp.'s return on equity of 30.89%.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.28, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Avery Dennison Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $211.90 which suggests that it could grow by 10.13%. Given that Avery Dennison Corp. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Avery Dennison Corp. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avery Dennison Corp. has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.039999999999996%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Avery Dennison Corp. offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Avery Dennison Corp. pays out 42.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Avery Dennison Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Avery Dennison Corp.'s net income of $166.4M. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.89x while Avery Dennison Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 8.54x versus 1.69x for Avery Dennison Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of --. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.28, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rollins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp., analysts believe Rollins, Inc. is more attractive than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s net income of -$54.8K. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.89x while Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 8.54x versus -- for Blackwell 3D Construction Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 4.85%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.94%.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.28, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Dream Finders Homes, Inc. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a beta of 1.861, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.132%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Dream Finders Homes, Inc. quarterly revenues of $969.8M. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s net income of $47.1M. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.89x while Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 8.54x versus 0.42x for Dream Finders Homes, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sealed Air Corp. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 13.74%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7%.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.28, signalling upside risk potential of 0.68%. On the other hand Sealed Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.02 which suggests that it could grow by 7.66%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, which suggesting that the stock is 22.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.988%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Sealed Air Corp. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp. pays out 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.89x while Sealed Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 8.54x versus 1.15x for Sealed Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.