ROL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 30.51%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Booking Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.92, signalling upside risk potential of 2.61%. On the other hand Booking Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6,187.89 which suggests that it could grow by 23.09%. Given that Booking Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Booking Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.324%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Booking Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.60 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings, Inc. pays out 20.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9B. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Booking Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.7B. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.67x while Booking Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 7.94x versus 6.36x for Booking Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 4.85%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.94%.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.92, signalling upside risk potential of 2.61%. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.52%. Given that Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Dream Finders Homes, Inc. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Dream Finders Homes, Inc. quarterly revenues of $969.8M. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s net income of $47.1M. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.67x while Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 7.94x versus 0.41x for Dream Finders Homes, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 21.85%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.92, signalling upside risk potential of 2.61%. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $269.79 which suggests that it could grow by 4.42%. Given that Expedia Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Expedia Group, Inc. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.941%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.67x while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 7.94x versus 2.37x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sealed Air Corp. has a net margin of 15.94% compared to Rollins, Inc.'s net margin of 13.74%. Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96% beat Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7%.

Rollins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.92, signalling upside risk potential of 2.61%. On the other hand Sealed Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.13 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.402% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.343%.

Rollins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Sealed Air Corp. offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Rollins, Inc. pays 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp. pays out 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M. Notably, Rollins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.67x while Sealed Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins, Inc. is 7.94x versus 1.17x for Sealed Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.