ROL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dream Finders Homes has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Rollins's net margin of 7.02%. Rollins's return on equity of 39.26% beat Dream Finders Homes's return on equity of 26.86%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.07%. Given that Dream Finders Homes has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Dream Finders Homes is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Dream Finders Homes offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 60.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes pays out 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $916.3M, which are smaller than Dream Finders Homes quarterly revenues of $1B. Rollins's net income of $136.9M is higher than Dream Finders Homes's net income of $70.7M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.88x while Dream Finders Homes's PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 6.86x versus 0.61x for Dream Finders Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Rollins's net margin of 16.85%. Rollins's return on equity of 39.26% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $187.83 which suggests that it could grow by 1.69%. Given that Rollins has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Rollins is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Rollins has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.55%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 60.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $916.3M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Rollins's net income of $136.9M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.88x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 23.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 6.86x versus 1.91x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Rollins's net margin of 10.93%. Rollins's return on equity of 39.26% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Rollins has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.05%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 210.572%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 60.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $916.3M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Rollins's net income of $136.9M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.88x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 6.86x versus 1.12x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Rollins's net margin of 7.33%. Rollins's return on equity of 39.26% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 4.17%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.93%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $17.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.88%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.357, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.698%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 60.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $916.3M, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $532M. Rollins's net income of $136.9M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of $39M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.88x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 57.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 6.86x versus 1.12x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.