ROL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dream Finders Homes has a net margin of 12.7% compared to Rollins's net margin of 8.28%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.57% beat Dream Finders Homes's return on equity of 27.18%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $51.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.99%. On the other hand Dream Finders Homes has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.24%. Given that Dream Finders Homes has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Dream Finders Homes is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dream Finders Homes has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Dream Finders Homes offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Dream Finders Homes pays out 4.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $832.2M, which are smaller than Dream Finders Homes quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Rollins's net income of $105.7M is lower than Dream Finders Homes's net income of $129.3M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.98x while Dream Finders Homes's PE ratio is 6.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.96x versus 0.50x for Dream Finders Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 12.7% compared to Rollins's net margin of 9.39%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.57% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $51.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.99%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $205.22 which suggests that it could grow by 31.32%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.349%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $832.2M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Rollins's net income of $105.7M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.98x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 17.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.96x versus 1.55x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 12.7% compared to Rollins's net margin of -16.86%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.57% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $51.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.99%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 74.24%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.867, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.735%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $832.2M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Rollins's net income of $105.7M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.98x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.96x versus 0.76x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of 12.7% compared to Rollins's net margin of 0.24%. Rollins's return on equity of 37.57% beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 0.56%.

Rollins has a consensus price target of $51.21, signalling downside risk potential of -7.99%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $16.65 which suggests that it could grow by 40.01%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Rollins, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Rollins.

Rollins has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.253, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.292%.

Rollins has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rollins pays 63.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rollins quarterly revenues are $832.2M, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $411M. Rollins's net income of $105.7M is higher than Tripadvisor's net income of $1M. Notably, Rollins's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.98x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 594.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rollins is 7.96x versus 0.93x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.