RF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

M&T Bank Corp. has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 22.91%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.54% beat M&T Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 9.84%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.94, signalling upside risk potential of 2.94%. On the other hand M&T Bank Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $232.17 which suggests that it could fall by -0.15%. Given that Regions Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than M&T Bank Corp., analysts believe Regions Financial Corp. is more attractive than M&T Bank Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M&T Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.364%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. M&T Bank Corp. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. M&T Bank Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than M&T Bank Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $534M is lower than M&T Bank Corp.'s net income of $757M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while M&T Bank Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.82x versus 2.81x for M&T Bank Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 23.07%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.54% beat The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.06%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.94, signalling upside risk potential of 2.94%. On the other hand The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $251.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.544%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. pays out 39.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.8B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $534M is lower than The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.'s net income of $2B. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.82x versus 2.72x for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial Corp. has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 17.68%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.54% beat Truist Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 8.19%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.94, signalling upside risk potential of 2.94%. On the other hand Truist Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $57.11 which suggests that it could grow by 9.15%. Given that Truist Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Truist Financial Corp. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.297%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. Truist Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial Corp. pays out 54.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Truist Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $534M is lower than Truist Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while Truist Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.82x versus 2.24x for Truist Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Community Banks, Inc. has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 22.26%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.54% beat United Community Banks, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.17%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $30.94, signalling upside risk potential of 2.94%. On the other hand United Community Banks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that United Community Banks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe United Community Banks, Inc. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Community Banks, Inc. has a beta of 0.843, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.669%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. United Community Banks, Inc. offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. United Community Banks, Inc. pays out 37.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than United Community Banks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $385.9M. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $534M is higher than United Community Banks, Inc.'s net income of $85.9M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.08x while United Community Banks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.82x versus 2.74x for United Community Banks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.