RF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 19.82%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Huntington Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.75%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $28.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.86%. Given that Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Huntington Bancshares, Inc. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.82%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Huntington Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares, Inc. pays out 50.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is lower than Huntington Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $633M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while Huntington Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.48x versus 2.04x for Huntington Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial Corp. has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 18.44%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Truist Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 8.08%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $28.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Truist Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.55 which suggests that it could grow by 6.36%. Given that Regions Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Truist Financial Corp., analysts believe Regions Financial Corp. is more attractive than Truist Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.933%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Truist Financial Corp. offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial Corp. pays out 6966.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Truist Financial Corp.'s is not.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Truist Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is lower than Truist Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while Truist Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.48x versus 2.04x for Truist Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Alliance Bancorp. has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 18.06%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Western Alliance Bancorp.'s return on equity of 12.81%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $28.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Western Alliance Bancorp. has an analysts' consensus of $100.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Western Alliance Bancorp. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Western Alliance Bancorp. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Alliance Bancorp. has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.812%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Western Alliance Bancorp. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Alliance Bancorp. pays out 21.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Western Alliance Bancorp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is higher than Western Alliance Bancorp.'s net income of $260.5M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while Western Alliance Bancorp.'s PE ratio is 10.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.48x versus 1.80x for Western Alliance Bancorp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorporation NA has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 17.48%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Zions Bancorporation NA's return on equity of 13.04%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $28.53, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Zions Bancorporation NA has an analysts' consensus of $61.86 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that Zions Bancorporation NA has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Zions Bancorporation NA is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorporation NA has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.23%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Zions Bancorporation NA offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorporation NA pays out 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Zions Bancorporation NA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is higher than Zions Bancorporation NA's net income of $219M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while Zions Bancorporation NA's PE ratio is 9.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.48x versus 1.65x for Zions Bancorporation NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.