RF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 19.82%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Huntington Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.75%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $29.39, signalling upside risk potential of 8.45%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Huntington Bancshares, Inc. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.08%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Huntington Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares, Inc. pays out 50.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is lower than Huntington Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of $633M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Huntington Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.56x versus 2.10x for Huntington Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial Corp. has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 18.44%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Truist Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 8.08%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $29.39, signalling upside risk potential of 8.45%. On the other hand Truist Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $51.24 which suggests that it could grow by 4.13%. Given that Regions Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Truist Financial Corp., analysts believe Regions Financial Corp. is more attractive than Truist Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.623%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Truist Financial Corp. offers a yield of 4.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial Corp. pays out 6966.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Truist Financial Corp.'s is not.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Truist Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is lower than Truist Financial Corp.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Truist Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.56x versus 2.11x for Truist Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Alliance Bancorp. has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 18.06%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Western Alliance Bancorp.'s return on equity of 12.81%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $29.39, signalling upside risk potential of 8.45%. On the other hand Western Alliance Bancorp. has an analysts' consensus of $101.56 which suggests that it could grow by 20.81%. Given that Western Alliance Bancorp. has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Western Alliance Bancorp. is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Alliance Bancorp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.861%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Western Alliance Bancorp. offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Alliance Bancorp. pays out 21.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Western Alliance Bancorp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is higher than Western Alliance Bancorp.'s net income of $260.5M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Western Alliance Bancorp.'s PE ratio is 10.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.56x versus 1.78x for Western Alliance Bancorp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorporation NA has a net margin of 23.55% compared to Regions Financial Corp.'s net margin of 17.48%. Regions Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.59% beat Zions Bancorporation NA's return on equity of 13.04%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a consensus price target of $29.39, signalling upside risk potential of 8.45%. On the other hand Zions Bancorporation NA has an analysts' consensus of $63.64 which suggests that it could grow by 8.71%. Given that Zions Bancorporation NA has higher upside potential than Regions Financial Corp., analysts believe Zions Bancorporation NA is more attractive than Regions Financial Corp..

Regions Financial Corp. has a beta of 1.033, which suggesting that the stock is 3.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorporation NA has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.291%.

Regions Financial Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Zions Bancorporation NA offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Regions Financial Corp. pays 50.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorporation NA pays out 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Zions Bancorporation NA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Regions Financial Corp.'s net income of $569M is higher than Zions Bancorporation NA's net income of $219M. Notably, Regions Financial Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.93x while Zions Bancorporation NA's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial Corp. is 2.56x versus 1.74x for Zions Bancorporation NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.