NDAQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 18.9% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 58.22%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5% beat CME Group's return on equity of 13.28%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $83.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $270.35 which suggests that it could fall by -4.92%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than CME Group.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.307%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. CME Group offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nasdaq's net income of $395M is lower than CME Group's net income of $956.2M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while CME Group's PE ratio is 28.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.87x versus 16.29x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 18.9% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 25.39%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5% beat FactSet Research Systems's return on equity of 28.1%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $83.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand FactSet Research Systems has an analysts' consensus of $440.39 which suggests that it could fall by -3.13%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than FactSet Research Systems, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than FactSet Research Systems.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.412%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. FactSet Research Systems offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than FactSet Research Systems quarterly revenues of $570.7M. Nasdaq's net income of $395M is higher than FactSet Research Systems's net income of $144.9M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while FactSet Research Systems's PE ratio is 32.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.87x versus 7.77x for FactSet Research Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 18.9% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 24.68%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $83.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $192.44 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.526%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Nasdaq's net income of $395M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 36.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.87x versus 8.43x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 18.9% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 32.48%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $83.72, signalling upside risk potential of 5.7%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $500.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.35%. Given that Moodys has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Moodys is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.022% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.353%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Nasdaq pays 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Nasdaq's net income of $395M is lower than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Moodys's PE ratio is 40.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 5.87x versus 11.85x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.