SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group, Inc. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 71.75%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat CME Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.67%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $537.90, signalling upside risk potential of 22.95%. On the other hand CME Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $299.29 which suggests that it could fall by -5.42%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than CME Group, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than CME Group, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.983%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. CME Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group, Inc. pays out 44.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than CME Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than CME Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while CME Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.70x versus 17.49x for CME Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 27.44%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $537.90, signalling upside risk potential of 22.95%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $196.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.33%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.406%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. pays out 33.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s net income of $862M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.70x versus 7.65x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moody's Corp. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 32.35%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat Moody's Corp.'s return on equity of 61.52%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $537.90, signalling upside risk potential of 22.95%. On the other hand Moody's Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $546.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.02%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Moody's Corp., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Moody's Corp..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moody's Corp. has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.955%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Moody's Corp. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Moody's Corp. pays out 27.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Moody's Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than Moody's Corp.'s net income of $611M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while Moody's Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.70x versus 11.17x for Moody's Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq, Inc. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 24.95%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat Nasdaq, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.2%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $537.90, signalling upside risk potential of 22.95%. On the other hand Nasdaq, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $107.80 which suggests that it could grow by 21.61%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Nasdaq, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.814%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Nasdaq, Inc. offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq, Inc. pays out 33.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Nasdaq, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than Nasdaq, Inc.'s net income of $519M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.84x while Nasdaq, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.70x versus 6.24x for Nasdaq, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.