SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group, Inc. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 71.19%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat CME Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.63%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $538.52, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand CME Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $307.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.57%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than CME Group, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than CME Group, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.266, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.427%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. CME Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7.45 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group, Inc. pays out 44.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than CME Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than CME Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.41x while CME Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.58x versus 17.32x for CME Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FactSet Research Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 21.78%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat FactSet Research Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.48%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $538.52, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand FactSet Research Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $253.31 which suggests that it could grow by 11.26%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than FactSet Research Systems, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than FactSet Research Systems, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FactSet Research Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.335%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. FactSet Research Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. FactSet Research Systems, Inc. pays out 27.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than FactSet Research Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $611M. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than FactSet Research Systems, Inc.'s net income of $133.1M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.41x while FactSet Research Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.58x versus 3.58x for FactSet Research Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moody's Corp. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 32.35%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat Moody's Corp.'s return on equity of 61.52%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $538.52, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Moody's Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $546.70 which suggests that it could grow by 24.03%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Moody's Corp., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Moody's Corp..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moody's Corp. has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.587%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Moody's Corp. offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Moody's Corp. pays out 27.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Moody's Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than Moody's Corp.'s net income of $611M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.41x while Moody's Corp.'s PE ratio is 32.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.58x versus 10.32x for Moody's Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSCI, Inc. has a net margin of 31.26% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 34.61%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.89% beat MSCI, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $538.52, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand MSCI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $673.75 which suggests that it could grow by 23.67%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than MSCI, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than MSCI, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSCI, Inc. has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.591%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. MSCI, Inc. offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 26.2% of its earnings as a dividend. MSCI, Inc. pays out 45.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than MSCI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $822.5M. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B is higher than MSCI, Inc.'s net income of $284.7M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.41x while MSCI, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 8.58x versus 13.34x for MSCI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.