SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group, Inc. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 58.68%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat CME Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.68%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $622.74, signalling upside risk potential of 18.02%. On the other hand CME Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $289.71 which suggests that it could fall by -0.36%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than CME Group, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than CME Group, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.983%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. CME Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group, Inc. pays out 107.52% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group, Inc.'s is not.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than CME Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than CME Group, Inc.'s net income of $902.3M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.36x while CME Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 10.78x versus 16.37x for CME Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 27.64%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.47%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $622.74, signalling upside risk potential of 18.02%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $191.86 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.406%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. pays out 37.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s net income of $831M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.36x while Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 10.78x versus 8.40x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moody's Corp. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 32.24%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat Moody's Corp.'s return on equity of 56.51%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $622.74, signalling upside risk potential of 18.02%. On the other hand Moody's Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $575.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.31%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Moody's Corp., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Moody's Corp..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moody's Corp. has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.955%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Moody's Corp. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Moody's Corp. pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Moody's Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Moody's Corp.'s net income of $647M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.36x while Moody's Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 10.78x versus 12.45x for Moody's Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq, Inc. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 24.95%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat Nasdaq, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.2%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $622.74, signalling upside risk potential of 18.02%. On the other hand Nasdaq, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $108.33 which suggests that it could grow by 11.9%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Nasdaq, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.203, which suggesting that the stock is 20.344% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.814%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Nasdaq, Inc. offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq, Inc. pays out 33.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Nasdaq, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Nasdaq, Inc.'s net income of $519M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.36x while Nasdaq, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 10.78x versus 6.82x for Nasdaq, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.