SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of -2.73%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.61 which suggests that it could grow by 7.04%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays out -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues of $579.8M. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.72x while Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.10x versus 1.62x for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 31.46%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 12.29%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $585.58 which suggests that it could fall by -0.97%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.124%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $15.1B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.72x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 13.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.10x versus 3.59x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of -6.09%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 3.58%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $139.30 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than KKR &, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than KKR &.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.914, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.408%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.1B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than KKR &'s net income of -$185.9M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.72x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 53.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.10x versus 7.71x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 32.48%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $585.87, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $500.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.68%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Moodys.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.353%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.72x while Moodys's PE ratio is 42.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.10x versus 12.27x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.