SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group, Inc. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 58.68%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat CME Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.68%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $611.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.74%. On the other hand CME Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $288.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than CME Group, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than CME Group, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.271, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.925%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. CME Group, Inc. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group, Inc. pays out 107.52% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group, Inc.'s is not.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than CME Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than CME Group, Inc.'s net income of $902.3M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.40x while CME Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 11.08x versus 14.78x for CME Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 27.64%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.47%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $611.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.74%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $189.36 which suggests that it could grow by 14.08%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has higher upside potential than S&P Global, Inc., analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is more attractive than S&P Global, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.889%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. pays out 37.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s net income of $831M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.40x while Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 11.08x versus 8.05x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moody's Corp. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 32.24%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat Moody's Corp.'s return on equity of 56.51%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $611.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.74%. On the other hand Moody's Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $561.68 which suggests that it could grow by 5.66%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Moody's Corp., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Moody's Corp..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moody's Corp. has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.249%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Moody's Corp. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Moody's Corp. pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Moody's Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Moody's Corp.'s net income of $647M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.40x while Moody's Corp.'s PE ratio is 42.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 11.08x versus 12.80x for Moody's Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq, Inc. has a net margin of 32.54% compared to S&P Global, Inc.'s net margin of 21.6%. S&P Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.05% beat Nasdaq, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.09%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of $611.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.74%. On the other hand Nasdaq, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $104.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that S&P Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, Inc., analysts believe S&P Global, Inc. is more attractive than Nasdaq, Inc..

S&P Global, Inc. has a beta of 1.207, which suggesting that the stock is 20.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.338%.

S&P Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Nasdaq, Inc. offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. S&P Global, Inc. pays 29.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq, Inc. pays out 48.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Nasdaq, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. S&P Global, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B is higher than Nasdaq, Inc.'s net income of $423M. Notably, S&P Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 39.40x while Nasdaq, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global, Inc. is 11.08x versus 6.97x for Nasdaq, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.