MMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a net margin of 12.91% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of -5.78%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 77.16% beat Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.63%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $174.56, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 511.03%. Given that Harte-Hanks, Inc. has higher upside potential than 3M Co., analysts believe Harte-Hanks, Inc. is more attractive than 3M Co..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks, Inc. has a beta of -0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.779%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Harte-Hanks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3M Co. pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Harte-Hanks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. 3M Co.'s net income of $841M is higher than Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while Harte-Hanks, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.56x versus 0.13x for Harte-Hanks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Honeywell International, Inc. has a net margin of 12.91% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of 17.86%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 77.16% beat Honeywell International, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.52%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $174.56, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand Honeywell International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $235.14 which suggests that it could grow by 17.86%. Given that Honeywell International, Inc. has higher upside potential than 3M Co., analysts believe Honeywell International, Inc. is more attractive than 3M Co..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Honeywell International, Inc. has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.626%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Honeywell International, Inc. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share. 3M Co. pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International, Inc. pays out 50.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are smaller than Honeywell International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.4B. 3M Co.'s net income of $841M is lower than Honeywell International, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while Honeywell International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.56x versus 3.17x for Honeywell International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 12.91% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of -443.46%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 77.16% beat Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -83.99%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $174.56, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 3M Co. has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings Corp., analysts believe 3M Co. is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings Corp..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.941%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Planet Green Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3M Co. pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $771.6K. 3M Co.'s net income of $841M is higher than Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while Planet Green Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.56x versus 4.30x for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard Corp. has a net margin of 12.91% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of 4.33%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 77.16% beat Seaboard Corp.'s return on equity of 8.41%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $174.56, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand Seaboard Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 3M Co. has higher upside potential than Seaboard Corp., analysts believe 3M Co. is more attractive than Seaboard Corp..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard Corp. has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.192%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Seaboard Corp. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. 3M Co. pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard Corp. pays out 9.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Seaboard Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. 3M Co.'s net income of $841M is higher than Seaboard Corp.'s net income of $110M. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.03x while Seaboard Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.56x versus 0.45x for Seaboard Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.