MMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Compass Diversified Holdings has a net margin of 9.36% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of 2.17%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 73.5% beat Compass Diversified Holdings's return on equity of 0.85%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $178.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.97%. On the other hand Compass Diversified Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 94.18%. Given that Compass Diversified Holdings has higher upside potential than 3M Co., analysts believe Compass Diversified Holdings is more attractive than 3M Co..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compass Diversified Holdings has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.444%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Compass Diversified Holdings offers a yield of 13.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. 3M Co. pays 48.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Compass Diversified Holdings pays out 367.57% of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Compass Diversified Holdings's is not.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.1B, which are larger than Compass Diversified Holdings quarterly revenues of $548.7M. 3M Co.'s net income of $574M is higher than Compass Diversified Holdings's net income of $11.9M. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while Compass Diversified Holdings's PE ratio is 39.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.58x versus 0.35x for Compass Diversified Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 9.36% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of 19.35%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 73.5% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 44.62%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $178.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.97%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $357.35 which suggests that it could grow by 6.76%. Given that 3M Co. has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe 3M Co. is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

3M Co. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.683%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. 3M Co. pays 48.63% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.1B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.7B. 3M Co.'s net income of $574M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.5B. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 41.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.58x versus 7.80x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Honeywell International, Inc. has a net margin of 9.36% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of 3.12%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 73.5% beat Honeywell International, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.01%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $178.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.97%. On the other hand Honeywell International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $244.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.6%. Given that 3M Co. has higher upside potential than Honeywell International, Inc., analysts believe 3M Co. is more attractive than Honeywell International, Inc..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Honeywell International, Inc. has a beta of 0.944, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.644%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Honeywell International, Inc. offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share. 3M Co. pays 48.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International, Inc. pays out 62.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.1B, which are smaller than Honeywell International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.8B. 3M Co.'s net income of $574M is higher than Honeywell International, Inc.'s net income of $304M. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while Honeywell International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.58x versus 3.83x for Honeywell International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 9.36% compared to 3M Co.'s net margin of -17648.49%. 3M Co.'s return on equity of 73.5% beat Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -100.92%.

3M Co. has a consensus price target of $178.20, signalling upside risk potential of 7.97%. On the other hand Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.08 which suggests that it could grow by 60%. Given that Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than 3M Co., analysts believe Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than 3M Co..

3M Co. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.96%.

3M Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 3M Co. pays 48.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. 3M Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

3M Co. quarterly revenues are $6.1B, which are larger than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365K. 3M Co.'s net income of $574M is higher than Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$64.4M. Notably, 3M Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.53x while Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 3M Co. is 3.58x versus 65.47x for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.