Financhill
Buy
53

MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$69.14
Seasonality move :
4.64%
Day range:
$68.51 - $69.19
52-week range:
$62.64 - $86.24
Dividend yield:
2.61%
P/E ratio:
23.85x
P/S ratio:
2.74x
P/B ratio:
3.22x
Volume:
1.5M
Avg. volume:
2.6M
1-year change:
-11.44%
Market cap:
$18.5B
Revenue:
$6.7B
EPS (TTM):
$2.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
$1.8B $0.88 7.39% 6.31% $76.50
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$3B $0.44 -2.93% 32.31% $19.11
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Co.
$6.3B $0.58 -3.02% -65.23% $27.13
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$1.6B $0.65 -1.8% -39.3% $54.64
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$2.2B $2.64 -13.66% -22% $170.70
UNFI
United Natural Foods, Inc.
$7.9B $0.40 -0.64% -71.32% $39.13
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
$68.93 $76.50 $18.5B 23.85x $0.48 2.61% 2.74x
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$17.24 $19.11 $8.2B 9.78x $0.35 8.12% 0.74x
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Co.
$24.13 $27.13 $28.6B 13.01x $0.40 6.63% 1.14x
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$42.15 $54.64 $5.9B 15.16x $0.37 3.51% 0.92x
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$139.41 $170.70 $24.3B 20.35x $1.02 2.92% 2.59x
UNFI
United Natural Foods, Inc.
$33.41 $39.13 $2B -- $0.00 0% 0.06x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
43.1% -0.247 23.04% 0.24x
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
48.51% -1.051 89.28% 0.24x
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Co.
33.83% -0.462 68.47% 0.62x
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
69.22% 0.660 48.72% 0.59x
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
58.44% -1.087 36.83% 0.28x
UNFI
United Natural Foods, Inc.
69.16% 1.169 151.15% 0.42x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
MKC
McCormick & Co., Inc.
$645.8M $293.3M 7.78% 14.05% 17% $206.1M
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$698.4M $371.3M -0.58% -1.13% 12.46% $138.8M
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Co.
$2B $1.1B -6.51% -9.47% 17.64% $986M
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$316.8M $172.2M 6.74% 22.95% 10.64% $101.9M
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$1.3B $866.7M 6.53% 16.4% 34.94% $634.8M
UNFI
United Natural Foods, Inc.
$988M $74M -1.9% -6.21% 0.94% -$54M

McCormick & Co., Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns MKC or CAG?

    Conagra Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 13.07% compared to McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net margin of -22.28%. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05% beat Conagra Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    37.44% $0.84 $10.1B
    CAG
    Conagra Brands, Inc.
    23.44% -$1.39 $15.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About MKC or CAG?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $76.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Conagra Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.11 which suggests that it could grow by 10.82%. Given that McCormick & Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, Inc., analysts believe McCormick & Co., Inc. is more attractive than Conagra Brands, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    4 8 0
    CAG
    Conagra Brands, Inc.
    0 12 1
  • Is MKC or CAG More Risky?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands, Inc. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.092%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKC or CAG?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Conagra Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 8.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands, Inc. pays out 58.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MKC or CAG?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3B. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M is higher than Conagra Brands, Inc.'s net income of -$663.6M. Notably, McCormick & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while Conagra Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & Co., Inc. is 2.74x versus 0.74x for Conagra Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    2.74x 23.85x $1.7B $225.5M
    CAG
    Conagra Brands, Inc.
    0.74x 9.78x $3B -$663.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns MKC or KHC?

    The Kraft Heinz Co. has a net margin of 13.07% compared to McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05% beat The Kraft Heinz Co.'s return on equity of -9.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    37.44% $0.84 $10.1B
    KHC
    The Kraft Heinz Co.
    32.48% $0.52 $62.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About MKC or KHC?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $76.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.13 which suggests that it could grow by 12.44%. Given that The Kraft Heinz Co. has higher upside potential than McCormick & Co., Inc., analysts believe The Kraft Heinz Co. is more attractive than McCormick & Co., Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    4 8 0
    KHC
    The Kraft Heinz Co.
    1 18 0
  • Is MKC or KHC More Risky?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz Co. has a beta of 0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.44%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKC or KHC?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. The Kraft Heinz Co. offers a yield of 6.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co. pays out 70.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MKC or KHC?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz Co. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M is lower than The Kraft Heinz Co.'s net income of $613M. Notably, McCormick & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while The Kraft Heinz Co.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & Co., Inc. is 2.74x versus 1.14x for The Kraft Heinz Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    2.74x 23.85x $1.7B $225.5M
    KHC
    The Kraft Heinz Co.
    1.14x 13.01x $6.2B $613M
  • Which has Higher Returns MKC or LW?

    Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.07% compared to McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net margin of 3.84%. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05% beat Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    37.44% $0.84 $10.1B
    LW
    Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
    19.58% $0.44 $5.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About MKC or LW?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $76.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.64 which suggests that it could grow by 29.62%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than McCormick & Co., Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than McCormick & Co., Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    4 8 0
    LW
    Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
    3 7 0
  • Is MKC or LW More Risky?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.026%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKC or LW?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MKC or LW?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, McCormick & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & Co., Inc. is 2.74x versus 0.92x for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    2.74x 23.85x $1.7B $225.5M
    LW
    Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
    0.92x 15.16x $1.6B $62.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns MKC or STZ?

    Constellation Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 13.07% compared to McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net margin of 19.6%. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05% beat Constellation Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    37.44% $0.84 $10.1B
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    51.43% $2.65 $18.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About MKC or STZ?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $76.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand Constellation Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $170.70 which suggests that it could grow by 22.44%. Given that Constellation Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than McCormick & Co., Inc., analysts believe Constellation Brands, Inc. is more attractive than McCormick & Co., Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    4 8 0
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    12 9 0
  • Is MKC or STZ More Risky?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.462, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.79%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKC or STZ?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Constellation Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands, Inc. pays out 2353.06% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Constellation Brands, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MKC or STZ?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Constellation Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M is lower than Constellation Brands, Inc.'s net income of $486.1M. Notably, McCormick & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while Constellation Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & Co., Inc. is 2.74x versus 2.59x for Constellation Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    2.74x 23.85x $1.7B $225.5M
    STZ
    Constellation Brands, Inc.
    2.59x 20.35x $2.5B $486.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns MKC or UNFI?

    United Natural Foods, Inc. has a net margin of 13.07% compared to McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05% beat United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    37.44% $0.84 $10.1B
    UNFI
    United Natural Foods, Inc.
    12.6% -$0.07 $5B
  • What do Analysts Say About MKC or UNFI?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $76.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.6%. On the other hand United Natural Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.13 which suggests that it could grow by 17.11%. Given that United Natural Foods, Inc. has higher upside potential than McCormick & Co., Inc., analysts believe United Natural Foods, Inc. is more attractive than McCormick & Co., Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    4 8 0
    UNFI
    United Natural Foods, Inc.
    2 8 0
  • Is MKC or UNFI More Risky?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.744% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.032%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKC or UNFI?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. United Natural Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MKC or UNFI?

    McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M is higher than United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, McCormick & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while United Natural Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & Co., Inc. is 2.74x versus 0.06x for United Natural Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MKC
    McCormick & Co., Inc.
    2.74x 23.85x $1.7B $225.5M
    UNFI
    United Natural Foods, Inc.
    0.06x -- $7.8B -$4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock