UNFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 1.88%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.85%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.13 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.768%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s net income of $19.1M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.73x for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AMCON Distributing Co. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 0.07%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat AMCON Distributing Co.'s return on equity of 0.49%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand AMCON Distributing Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Natural Foods, Inc. has higher upside potential than AMCON Distributing Co., analysts believe United Natural Foods, Inc. is more attractive than AMCON Distributing Co..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMCON Distributing Co. has a beta of 0.139, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.129%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMCON Distributing Co. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMCON Distributing Co. pays out 78.04% of its earnings as a dividend. AMCON Distributing Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than AMCON Distributing Co. quarterly revenues of $746.3M. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than AMCON Distributing Co.'s net income of $491.7K. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AMCON Distributing Co.'s PE ratio is 118.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.02x for AMCON Distributing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 3.88%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.04%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.18 which suggests that it could grow by 50.83%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.026%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $64.3M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.96x for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 2.27%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.56%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Post Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $123.22 which suggests that it could grow by 22.21%. Given that Post Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe Post Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 18.032% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.483%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $51.1M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Post Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.06x versus 0.78x for Post Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.