UNFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 3.84%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.64 which suggests that it could grow by 16.47%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.42199999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.326%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.07x versus 1.02x for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & Co., Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 12.25%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.12%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand McCormick & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $73.85 which suggests that it could grow by 9.13%. Given that McCormick & Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe McCormick & Co., Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.42199999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.385%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McCormick & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays out 61.43% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $226.6M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McCormick & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.07x versus 2.66x for McCormick & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco Corp. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 1.87%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat Sysco Corp.'s return on equity of 87.4%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand Sysco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $90.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.04%. Given that United Natural Foods, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sysco Corp., analysts believe United Natural Foods, Inc. is more attractive than Sysco Corp..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.42199999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco Corp. has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.083%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco Corp. offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco Corp. pays out 55.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are smaller than Sysco Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.8B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than Sysco Corp.'s net income of $389M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sysco Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.51x for Sysco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding Corp. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net margin of 1.88%. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21% beat US Foods Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 14.99%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.13, signalling upside risk potential of 8.4%. On the other hand US Foods Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $110.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.5%. Given that US Foods Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe US Foods Holding Corp. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.42199999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.412%.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are smaller than US Foods Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.8B. United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M is lower than US Foods Holding Corp.'s net income of $184M. Notably, United Natural Foods, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Foods Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.54x for US Foods Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.