LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Campbell's Co. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.25%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95% beat The Campbell's Co.'s return on equity of 14.83%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.64, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand The Campbell's Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.06 which suggests that it could grow by 19.22%. Given that The Campbell's Co. has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The Campbell's Co. is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc..

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's Co. has a beta of -0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.556%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. The Campbell's Co. offers a yield of 5.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's Co. pays out 76.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Campbell's Co. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M is lower than The Campbell's Co.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while The Campbell's Co.'s PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is 1.02x versus 0.77x for The Campbell's Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills, Inc. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.52%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95% beat General Mills, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.02%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.64, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand General Mills, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.16 which suggests that it could grow by 8.12%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Mills, Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than General Mills, Inc..

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills, Inc. has a beta of -0.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.332%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. General Mills, Inc. offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills, Inc. pays out 58.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than General Mills, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M is lower than General Mills, Inc.'s net income of $414.3M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while General Mills, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is 1.02x versus 1.30x for General Mills, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mama's Creations, Inc. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.14%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95% beat Mama's Creations, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.16%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.64, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand Mama's Creations, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.17 which suggests that it could grow by 22.07%. Given that Mama's Creations, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mama's Creations, Inc. is more attractive than Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc..

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mama's Creations, Inc. has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.874%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. Mama's Creations, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Mama's Creations, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Mama's Creations, Inc. quarterly revenues of $47.3M. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M is higher than Mama's Creations, Inc.'s net income of $540K. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while Mama's Creations, Inc.'s PE ratio is 141.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is 1.02x versus 4.38x for Mama's Creations, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.95% beat United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $54.64, signalling upside risk potential of 16.47%. On the other hand United Natural Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.4%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.427, which suggesting that the stock is 57.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.42199999999999%.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.18%. United Natural Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $62.1M is higher than United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.87x while United Natural Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is 1.02x versus 0.07x for United Natural Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.