LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 12.92%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.01%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.10 which suggests that it could grow by 13.81%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.047, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.326%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.08x while General Mills's PE ratio is 11.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.15x versus 1.56x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 11.87%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.01%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.56 which suggests that it could grow by 11.13%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.853%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.08x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.15x versus 1.35x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 8.98%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 17.82%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.01%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of $194.90 which suggests that it could grow by 20.69%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Lancaster Colony, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Lancaster Colony.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.13%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $457.8M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Lancaster Colony's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.08x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 26.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.15x versus 2.35x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 6.63%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 32.03%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.01%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $48.26 which suggests that it could grow by 3.48%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, which suggesting that the stock is 53.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.436%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $296M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.08x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 9.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.15x versus 0.62x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.