LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 25.63%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.43%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $166.70 which suggests that it could grow by 27.43%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.82x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.39x versus 1.84x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 6.43%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.43%. On the other hand Jackson Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $109.75 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Jackson Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Jackson Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Jackson Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays out 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is higher than Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.82x while Jackson Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.39x versus 1.45x for Jackson Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 5.2%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.43%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.64 which suggests that it could grow by 18.73%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.717%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.4B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is lower than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.82x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.39x versus 0.74x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 24.13%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.48%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.43%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $299.83 which suggests that it could grow by 18.72%. Given that Primerica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Primerica, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.941%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 24.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $854.3M. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is higher than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $206.1M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.82x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.39x versus 2.54x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.