LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 8.17%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.47%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.34%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.93%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.08%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.21%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 30.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $754M is higher than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $138M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.51x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.34x versus 0.51x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 10.18%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 6.53%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.34%. On the other hand Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.792%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.21%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 30.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues of $72.1M. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $754M is higher than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $7.3M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.51x while Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s PE ratio is 18.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.34x versus 1.02x for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 3.43%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.03%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.34%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than MetLife, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than MetLife, Inc..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.894%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.21%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 30.84% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 47.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.8B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $754M is lower than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $816M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.51x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.34x versus 0.61x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 6%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 12.41% beat Prudential Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.25%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $45.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.34%. On the other hand Prudential Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $109.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.52%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Prudential Financial, Inc..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.232, which suggesting that the stock is 23.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.898%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.21%. Prudential Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 5.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 30.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial, Inc. pays out 54.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.7B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $754M is lower than Prudential Financial, Inc.'s net income of $941M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.51x while Prudential Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.34x versus 0.57x for Prudential Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.