LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MetLife has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 6.92%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.21%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $95.43 which suggests that it could grow by 15.87%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.545%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.4B. Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B is higher than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.95x while MetLife's PE ratio is 13.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.35x versus 0.84x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 21.2%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29% beat Primerica's return on equity of 22.24%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $313.57 which suggests that it could grow by 10.21%. Given that Primerica has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Primerica is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.492%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $788.1M. Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B is higher than Primerica's net income of $167.1M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.95x while Primerica's PE ratio is 20.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.35x versus 3.13x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reinsurance Group of America has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 2.85%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29% beat Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Reinsurance Group of America has an analysts' consensus of $251.36 which suggests that it could grow by 31.01%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.382%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Reinsurance Group of America offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are smaller than Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B is higher than Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.95x while Reinsurance Group of America's PE ratio is 17.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.35x versus 0.58x for Reinsurance Group of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 10.88%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $39.18, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $91.85 which suggests that it could grow by 12.92%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, which suggesting that the stock is 76.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.503%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.01%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $348.7M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.95x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 8.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.35x versus 1.20x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.