LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 25.63%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $46.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.28%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.927%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.42x versus 2.02x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jackson Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 6.43%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat Jackson Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.87%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $46.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand Jackson Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $112.67 which suggests that it could grow by 3.84%. Given that Jackson Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Jackson Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jackson Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Jackson Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Jackson Financial, Inc. pays out 23.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Jackson Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is higher than Jackson Financial, Inc.'s net income of $91M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while Jackson Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.42x versus 1.60x for Jackson Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 5.2%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $46.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $93.47 which suggests that it could grow by 15.32%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.717%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.4B. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is lower than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.42x versus 0.77x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 9.09% compared to Lincoln National Corp.'s net margin of 24.13%. Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.48%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a consensus price target of $46.33, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $298.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.8%. Given that Primerica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Primerica, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.865% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.941%.

Lincoln National Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.91%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Lincoln National Corp. pays 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 24.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $854.3M. Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M is higher than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $206.1M. Notably, Lincoln National Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National Corp. is 0.42x versus 2.64x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.