KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Vita Coco has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.49%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.85%. On the other hand The Vita Coco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.93%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.1%. The Vita Coco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than The Vita Coco quarterly revenues of $132.9M. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is higher than The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while The Vita Coco's PE ratio is 36.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.83x versus 4.29x for The Vita Coco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 15.83%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.85%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.118%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.1%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.83x versus 2.94x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 19.72%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.85%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $55.2884 which suggests that it could grow by 6.9%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.246%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.1%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 33.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.83x versus 7.20x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 12.57%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.72, signalling upside risk potential of 17.85%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, which suggesting that the stock is 39.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.414%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.1%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.85x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.83x versus 2.29x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.