KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of -3.54%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 5.8%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $74.68, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.76 which suggests that it could grow by 10.22%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.513%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of -$144M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 32.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.49x versus 3.05x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.94%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $74.68, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.4671 which suggests that it could fall by -3.61%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.833%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 36.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.49x versus 7.92x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 5.48%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $74.68, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $163.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.125%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.49x versus 2.25x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 10.52%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 8.35%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $74.68, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $65.84 which suggests that it could grow by 8%. Given that Molson Coors Beverage has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Molson Coors Beverage is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.943% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.779%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $287.8M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.64x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.49x versus 1.10x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.