KMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of -2965.78%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $90.71, signalling upside risk potential of 22.15%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2833.99%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than CarMax.

CarMax has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of -$1.4M. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.17x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.45x versus 5.29x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of 1.71%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $90.71, signalling upside risk potential of 22.15%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $490.22 which suggests that it could grow by 16.34%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

CarMax has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.524%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.17x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.45x versus 0.28x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of 10.63%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Openlane's return on equity of 8.26%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $90.71, signalling upside risk potential of 22.15%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $24.14 which suggests that it could grow by 14.31%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Openlane.

CarMax has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.861%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Openlane quarterly revenues of $492M. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Openlane's net income of $52.3M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.17x while Openlane's PE ratio is 46.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.45x versus 1.29x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 2.02% compared to CarMax's net margin of -5.37%. CarMax's return on equity of 7.51% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -46.15%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $90.71, signalling upside risk potential of 22.15%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -48.12%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

CarMax has a beta of 1.759, which suggesting that the stock is 75.897% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.040, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.966%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $30.2M. CarMax's net income of $125.4M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.17x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.45x versus 1.86x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.