ICE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 23.04% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 57.34%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.94%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $189.19, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $260.24 which suggests that it could fall by -3.03%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than CME Group.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.398% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.427, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.303%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. CME Group offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M is lower than CME Group's net income of $874.6M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while CME Group's PE ratio is 27.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.20x versus 15.76x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 23.04% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 23.62%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29% beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.32%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $189.19, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $540.34 which suggests that it could grow by 22.14%. Given that Moodys has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, analysts believe Moodys is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.398% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.384%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M is higher than Moodys's net income of $395M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Moodys's PE ratio is 39.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.20x versus 11.40x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 23.04% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 17.49%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $189.19, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $88.39 which suggests that it could grow by 19.78%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.398% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.075%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M is higher than Nasdaq's net income of $355M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 38.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.20x versus 5.78x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 23.04% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 24.5%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.29% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.07%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $189.19, signalling upside risk potential of 12.91%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $608.24 which suggests that it could grow by 24.29%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.398% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.168%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $698M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $880M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.05x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 39.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 8.20x versus 10.74x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.