MSCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Moodys has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 32.48%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $614.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $500.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Moodys.

MSCI has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.353%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are smaller than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is lower than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.35x while Moodys's PE ratio is 40.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.00x versus 11.88x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 13.49%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $614.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $333.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.18%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Morningstar, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Morningstar.

MSCI has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.607%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are larger than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $581.9M. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is higher than Morningstar's net income of $78.5M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.35x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 34.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.00x versus 5.68x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 18.9%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $614.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $83.72 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Nasdaq.

MSCI has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.022%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.35x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 35.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.00x versus 5.86x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 28.86%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $614.53, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $585.87 which suggests that it could grow by 15.42%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.865%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.8B. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $1.1B. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.35x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 39.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.00x versus 10.87x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.