IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ibotta has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 77.43%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Ibotta's return on equity of 27.13%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $252.27, signalling downside risk potential of -5.4%. On the other hand Ibotta has an analysts' consensus of $60.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.43%. Given that Ibotta has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Ibotta is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibotta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Ibotta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibotta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Ibotta quarterly revenues of $98.4M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Ibotta's net income of $76.2M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.90x while Ibotta's PE ratio is 34.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.97x versus 4.94x for Ibotta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 8.55%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $252.27, signalling downside risk potential of -5.4%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $174.34 which suggests that it could grow by 11.22%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.769%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Business Machines's is not.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.90x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.97x versus 1.25x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pagaya Technologies has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 2.79%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $252.27, signalling downside risk potential of -5.4%. On the other hand Pagaya Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.58 which suggests that it could grow by 60.97%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Pagaya Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Pagaya Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues of $282.7M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.90x while Pagaya Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.97x versus 0.99x for Pagaya Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 7.26% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 24.22%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $252.27, signalling downside risk potential of -5.4%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $95.91 which suggests that it could fall by -25.14%. Given that Palantir Technologies has more downside risk than International Business Machines, analysts believe International Business Machines is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, which suggesting that the stock is 35.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $14.5B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.90x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 557.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.97x versus 102.37x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.