Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
67
IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$299.51
Seasonality move
:
3.71%
Day range:
$294.42 - $303.04
52-week range:
$214.50 - $324.90
Dividend yield:
2.22%
P/E ratio:
36.18x
P/S ratio:
4.38x
P/B ratio:
10.13x
Volume:
4.1M
Avg. volume:
3.7M
1-year change:
35.84%
Market cap:
$282.7B
Revenue:
$62.8B
EPS (TTM):
$8.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
|
$19.2B | $4.31 | 6.95% | 73.33% | $301.00 |
|
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
|
$308M | $0.10 | 16.59% | -- | $30.90 |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
|
$3.9B | $0.64 | 3.87% | -27.96% | $37.60 |
|
MDB
MongoDB, Inc.
|
$593.4M | $0.79 | 22.06% | 686.72% | $445.64 |
|
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
|
$1.3B | $0.23 | 62.04% | 636.19% | $188.45 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
|
$302.47 | $301.00 | $282.7B | 36.18x | $1.68 | 2.22% | 4.38x |
|
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
|
$30.18 | $30.90 | $10.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 9.17x |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
|
$26.74 | $37.60 | $6.1B | 15.76x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.43x |
|
MDB
MongoDB, Inc.
|
$435.86 | $445.64 | $35.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 15.43x |
|
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
|
$179.71 | $188.45 | $428.3B | 420.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 117.79x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
|
70.46% | 1.475 | 25.23% | 0.60x |
|
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
|
49.72% | 1.273 | 15.98% | 3.78x |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
|
76.64% | 2.091 | 57.51% | 0.65x |
|
MDB
MongoDB, Inc.
|
2.25% | 3.422 | 0.23% | 4.90x |
|
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
|
3.45% | 0.547 | 0.05% | 6.31x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
|
$9.3B | $3.3B | 8.72% | 29.45% | 20.02% | $2.7B |
|
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
|
$221.2M | -$85.4M | -14.28% | -29.79% | -28.59% | $24.6M |
|
CRWV
CoreWeave
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
|
$802M | $143M | 7.69% | 31.84% | 3.84% | $17M |
|
MDB
MongoDB, Inc.
|
$445.3M | -$18.4M | -2.42% | -2.69% | -2.93% | $141.8M |
|
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
|
$973.8M | $393.3M | 18.88% | 19.7% | 33.3% | $500.9M |
International Business Machines Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IBM or CFLT?
Confluent, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of -22.28%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.56.78% $1.84 $94.6B CFLTConfluent, Inc.74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About IBM or CFLT?
International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $301.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand Confluent, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.90 which suggests that it could grow by 2.4%. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.9 7 2 CFLTConfluent, Inc.4 22 0 -
Is IBM or CFLT More Risky?
International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBM or CFLT?
International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Confluent, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Confluent, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBM or CFLT?
International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues of $298.5M. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.18x while Confluent, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.38x versus 9.17x for Confluent, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.4.38x 36.18x $16.3B $1.7B CFLTConfluent, Inc.9.17x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns IBM or CRWV?
CoreWeave has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of --. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.56.78% $1.84 $94.6B CRWVCoreWeave-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IBM or CRWV?
International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $301.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Business Machines Corp. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe International Business Machines Corp. is more attractive than CoreWeave.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.9 7 2 CRWVCoreWeave0 0 0 -
Is IBM or CRWV More Risky?
International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBM or CRWV?
International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBM or CRWV?
International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.18x while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.38x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.4.38x 36.18x $16.3B $1.7B CRWVCoreWeave-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IBM or KD?
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of 1.83%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.56.78% $1.84 $94.6B KDKyndryl Holdings, Inc.21.55% $0.29 $5.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IBM or KD?
International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $301.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.60 which suggests that it could grow by 40.61%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.9 7 2 KDKyndryl Holdings, Inc.3 1 0 -
Is IBM or KD More Risky?
International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBM or KD?
International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBM or KD?
International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.18x while Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.38x versus 0.43x for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.4.38x 36.18x $16.3B $1.7B KDKyndryl Holdings, Inc.0.43x 15.76x $3.7B $68M
-
Which has Higher Returns IBM or MDB?
MongoDB, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of -0.32%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat MongoDB, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.56.78% $1.84 $94.6B MDBMongoDB, Inc.70.88% -$0.02 $3B -
What do Analysts Say About IBM or MDB?
International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $301.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand MongoDB, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $445.64 which suggests that it could grow by 2.24%. Given that MongoDB, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe MongoDB, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.9 7 2 MDBMongoDB, Inc.24 11 0 -
Is IBM or MDB More Risky?
International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB, Inc. has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.671%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBM or MDB?
International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. MongoDB, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBM or MDB?
International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than MongoDB, Inc. quarterly revenues of $628.3M. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than MongoDB, Inc.'s net income of -$2M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.18x while MongoDB, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.38x versus 15.43x for MongoDB, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.4.38x 36.18x $16.3B $1.7B MDBMongoDB, Inc.15.43x -- $628.3M -$2M
-
Which has Higher Returns IBM or PLTR?
Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of 40.37%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.56.78% $1.84 $94.6B PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc.82.45% $0.19 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About IBM or PLTR?
International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $301.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.49%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $188.45 which suggests that it could grow by 4.87%. Given that Palantir Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Palantir Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.9 7 2 PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc.3 17 2 -
Is IBM or PLTR More Risky?
International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.088% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.423%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IBM or PLTR?
International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IBM or PLTR?
International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.18x while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 420.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.38x versus 117.79x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IBMInternational Business Machines Corp.4.38x 36.18x $16.3B $1.7B PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc.117.79x 420.37x $1.2B $476.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 58.95% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 8.88% over the past day.
Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7
Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is up 2.99% over the past day.
