Financhill
Buy
53

CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$30.69
Seasonality move :
-28.58%
Day range:
$30.52 - $30.64
52-week range:
$15.64 - $36.25
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
9.00x
P/B ratio:
9.35x
Volume:
13.6M
Avg. volume:
16.6M
1-year change:
-15.65%
Market cap:
$10.9B
Revenue:
$1.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.86

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$308.2M $0.10 18.01% -- $30.89
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- -- -- -- --
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$19.2B $4.29 7.48% 62.12% $324.95
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
$1.3B $0.23 74.07% 233.26% $189.92
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
$43M $0.22 -2.68% -69.92% $11.00
UIS
Unisys Corp.
$569.8M $0.69 1.1% 67.28% $5.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$30.56 $30.89 $10.9B -- $0.00 0% 9.00x
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$262.38 $324.95 $245.3B 23.54x $1.68 2.56% 3.69x
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
$131.41 $189.92 $313.2B 206.52x $0.00 0% 75.32x
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
$9.00 $11.00 $103.6M 20.95x $0.00 0% 0.57x
UIS
Unisys Corp.
$2.24 $5.00 $159.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.08x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
48.6% 1.241 10.26% 3.60x
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- 0.000 -- --
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
66.43% 1.324 23.33% 0.77x
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
3.01% 0.513 0.05% 6.99x
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
76.55% -3.629 258.33% 1.31x
UIS
Unisys Corp.
164% 1.440 262.39% 1.31x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$235.1M -$79.6M -13.57% -27.66% -25.27% $35.5M
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- -- -- -- -- --
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$12.1B $4.2B 11.32% 37.05% 21.16% $3.1B
PLTR
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
$1.2B $575.4M 25.54% 26.52% 40.9% $764M
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
$28.9M $5.9M -3.86% -20.02% 13.97% $35.9M
UIS
Unisys Corp.
$115.5M $22.5M -87.14% -- 4.89% $19.9M

Confluent, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or CRWV?

    CoreWeave has a net margin of -25.17% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of --. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.66% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.68% -$0.23 $2.3B
    CRWV
    CoreWeave
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or CRWV?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    2 24 0
    CRWV
    CoreWeave
    0 0 0
  • Is CFLT or CRWV More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or CRWV?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or CRWV?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314.8M, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$79.2M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.00x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.00x -- $314.8M -$79.2M
    CRWV
    CoreWeave
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or IBM?

    International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of -25.17% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 28.34%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.66% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 37.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.68% -$0.23 $2.3B
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    61.56% $5.88 $97.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $324.95 which suggests that it could grow by 23.85%. Given that International Business Machines Corp. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe International Business Machines Corp. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    2 24 0
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    9 8 2
  • Is CFLT or IBM More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.275%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 60.07% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314.8M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$79.2M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $5.6B. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.00x versus 3.69x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.00x -- $314.8M -$79.2M
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    3.69x 23.54x $19.7B $5.6B
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or PLTR?

    Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -25.17% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 43.48%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.66% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.52%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.68% -$0.23 $2.3B
    PLTR
    Palantir Technologies, Inc.
    84.65% $0.24 $7.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or PLTR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $189.92 which suggests that it could grow by 45.16%. Given that Palantir Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Palantir Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    2 24 0
    PLTR
    Palantir Technologies, Inc.
    12 12 1
  • Is CFLT or PLTR More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.665%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or PLTR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or PLTR?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314.8M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$79.2M is lower than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $611.6M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 206.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.00x versus 75.32x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.00x -- $314.8M -$79.2M
    PLTR
    Palantir Technologies, Inc.
    75.32x 206.52x $1.4B $611.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or SNCR?

    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -25.17% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 13.84%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.66% beat Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.68% -$0.23 $2.3B
    SNCR
    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
    68.76% $0.51 $236.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or SNCR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    2 24 0
    SNCR
    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
  • Is CFLT or SNCR More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.242%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or SNCR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or SNCR?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314.8M, which are larger than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$79.2M is lower than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $5.8M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.00x versus 0.57x for Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.00x -- $314.8M -$79.2M
    SNCR
    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
    0.57x 20.95x $42M $5.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or UIS?

    Unisys Corp. has a net margin of -25.17% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of -67.19%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -27.66% beat Unisys Corp.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.68% -$0.23 $2.3B
    UIS
    Unisys Corp.
    25.1% -$4.33 $484.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or UIS?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.89, signalling upside risk potential of 1.1%. On the other hand Unisys Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 123.21%. Given that Unisys Corp. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Unisys Corp. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    2 24 0
    UIS
    Unisys Corp.
    1 1 0
  • Is CFLT or UIS More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unisys Corp. has a beta of 1.437, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.652%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or UIS?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unisys Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unisys Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or UIS?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $314.8M, which are smaller than Unisys Corp. quarterly revenues of $460.2M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$79.2M is higher than Unisys Corp.'s net income of -$309.2M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unisys Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.00x versus 0.08x for Unisys Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.00x -- $314.8M -$79.2M
    UIS
    Unisys Corp.
    0.08x -- $460.2M -$309.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 17

Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is down 3.36% over the past day.

Buy
58
TPH alert for Feb 17

Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. [TPH] is down 0.24% over the past day.

Sell
20
IRON alert for Feb 17

Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is up 17.19% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock