Financhill
Buy
51

CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$23.35
Seasonality move :
4.61%
Day range:
$23.22 - $23.77
52-week range:
$15.64 - $37.90
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
7.09x
P/B ratio:
7.30x
Volume:
5.1M
Avg. volume:
7.4M
1-year change:
-29.41%
Market cap:
$8.2B
Revenue:
$963.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.90

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$292.9M $0.10 17.93% -- $27.87
ASUR
Asure Software, Inc.
$35.9M $0.21 26.06% 900% $13.22
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$16.1B $2.45 9.56% 39.45% $292.09
PENG
Penguin Solutions
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$23.35 $27.87 $8.2B -- $0.00 0% 7.09x
ASUR
Asure Software, Inc.
$8.28 $13.22 $229.9M -- $0.00 0% 1.70x
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
$3.62 -- $9.8M 6.05x $0.00 0% 0.12x
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
$1.69 -- $46.9M -- $0.00 0% 31.12x
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$307.99 $292.09 $287.9B 36.84x $1.68 2.18% 4.46x
PENG
Penguin Solutions
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
49.72% 1.803 15.98% 3.78x
ASUR
Asure Software, Inc.
28.55% 0.913 33.94% 0.25x
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
32.4% 6.607 32.92% 0.43x
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
-54.83% -1.670 1.06% 0.26x
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
70.46% 1.451 25.23% 0.60x
PENG
Penguin Solutions
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$221.2M -$85.4M -14.28% -29.79% -28.59% $24.6M
ASUR
Asure Software, Inc.
$18.4M -$3.5M -7.23% -8.71% -9.65% -$6.8M
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
$262.6K -$4.5M -110.3% -213.22% -118.21% -$2.6M
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
$278.5K -$4M -- -- -510.38% -$5.1M
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$9.3B $3.3B 8.72% 29.45% 20.02% $2.7B
PENG
Penguin Solutions
-- -- -- -- -- --

Confluent, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or ASUR?

    Asure Software, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of -14.79%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Asure Software, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    ASUR
    Asure Software, Inc.
    50.68% -$0.19 $270.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or ASUR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 19.36%. On the other hand Asure Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.22 which suggests that it could grow by 59.69%. Given that Asure Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Asure Software, Inc. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    18 9 0
    ASUR
    Asure Software, Inc.
    7 0 0
  • Is CFLT or ASUR More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asure Software, Inc. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.108%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or ASUR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Asure Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Asure Software, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or ASUR?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Asure Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $36.3M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than Asure Software, Inc.'s net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Asure Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 7.09x versus 1.70x for Asure Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    7.09x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    ASUR
    Asure Software, Inc.
    1.70x -- $36.3M -$5.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or CYCU?

    Cycurion, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of -84.53%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Cycurion, Inc.'s return on equity of -213.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    CYCU
    Cycurion, Inc.
    6.85% -$1.59 $24.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or CYCU?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 19.36%. On the other hand Cycurion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cycurion, Inc., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than Cycurion, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    18 9 0
    CYCU
    Cycurion, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is CFLT or CYCU More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or CYCU?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or CYCU?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Cycurion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than Cycurion, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 7.09x versus 0.12x for Cycurion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    7.09x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    CYCU
    Cycurion, Inc.
    0.12x 6.05x $3.8M -$3.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or DAIC?

    CID Holdco, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of -541.63%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat CID Holdco, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    DAIC
    CID Holdco, Inc.
    35.77% -$0.15 -$1.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or DAIC?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 19.36%. On the other hand CID Holdco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, Inc., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than CID Holdco, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    18 9 0
    DAIC
    CID Holdco, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is CFLT or DAIC More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or DAIC?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or DAIC?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than CID Holdco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $778.5K. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than CID Holdco, Inc.'s net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CID Holdco, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 7.09x versus 31.12x for CID Holdco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    7.09x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    DAIC
    CID Holdco, Inc.
    31.12x -- $778.5K -$4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or IBM?

    International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 10.68%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    56.78% $1.84 $94.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 19.36%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $292.09 which suggests that it could fall by -5.16%. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    18 9 0
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    8 8 2
  • Is CFLT or IBM More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.128%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 7.09x versus 4.46x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    7.09x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    4.46x 36.84x $16.3B $1.7B
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or PENG?

    Penguin Solutions has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of --. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Penguin Solutions's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    PENG
    Penguin Solutions
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or PENG?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.87, signalling upside risk potential of 19.36%. On the other hand Penguin Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than Penguin Solutions, analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than Penguin Solutions.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    18 9 0
    PENG
    Penguin Solutions
    0 0 0
  • Is CFLT or PENG More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penguin Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or PENG?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penguin Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penguin Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or PENG?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Penguin Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is higher than Penguin Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Penguin Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 7.09x versus -- for Penguin Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    7.09x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    PENG
    Penguin Solutions
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.

Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock