Financhill
Buy
60

CFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$30.53
Seasonality move :
-7.19%
Day range:
$30.52 - $30.59
52-week range:
$15.64 - $37.90
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
9.28x
P/B ratio:
9.55x
Volume:
7.3M
Avg. volume:
9.5M
1-year change:
5.57%
Market cap:
$10.7B
Revenue:
$963.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.90

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$308.1M $0.10 16.57% -- $30.65
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- -- -- -- --
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
$3.8M -$2.45 -- -- $7.00
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$19.2B $4.29 7.01% 72.56% $305.16
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
$43M $0.22 2.06% -66.42% $11.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$30.54 $30.65 $10.7B -- $0.00 0% 9.28x
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
$2.40 $7.00 $8.7M 6.05x $0.00 0% 0.08x
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
$0.42 -- $11.7M -- $0.00 0% 7.73x
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$293.86 $305.16 $274.7B 35.15x $1.68 2.28% 4.25x
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
$8.82 $11.00 $101.5M 20.95x $0.00 0% 0.56x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
49.72% 1.273 15.98% 3.78x
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- 0.000 -- --
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
32.4% 7.584 32.93% 0.43x
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
-54.83% -0.738 1.06% 0.26x
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
70.46% 1.475 25.23% 0.60x
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
76.55% -3.551 258.33% 1.31x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CFLT
Confluent, Inc.
$221.2M -$85.4M -14.28% -29.79% -28.59% $24.6M
CRWV
CoreWeave
-- -- -- -- -- --
CYCU
Cycurion, Inc.
$262.6K -$4.5M -110.3% -213.22% -118.21% -$2.6M
DAIC
CID Holdco, Inc.
$278.5K -$4M -- -- -510.38% -$5.1M
IBM
International Business Machines Corp.
$9.3B $3.3B 8.72% 29.45% 20.02% $2.7B
SNCR
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
$28.9M $5.9M -3.86% -20.02% 13.97% $35.9M

Confluent, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or CRWV?

    CoreWeave has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of --. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    CRWV
    CoreWeave
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or CRWV?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.65, signalling upside risk potential of 0.36%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    3 24 0
    CRWV
    CoreWeave
    0 0 0
  • Is CFLT or CRWV More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or CRWV?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or CRWV?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.28x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.28x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    CRWV
    CoreWeave
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or CYCU?

    Cycurion, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of -84.53%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Cycurion, Inc.'s return on equity of -213.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    CYCU
    Cycurion, Inc.
    6.85% -$1.56 $24.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or CYCU?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.65, signalling upside risk potential of 0.36%. On the other hand Cycurion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 191.67%. Given that Cycurion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Cycurion, Inc. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    3 24 0
    CYCU
    Cycurion, Inc.
    1 0 0
  • Is CFLT or CYCU More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or CYCU?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or CYCU?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Cycurion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than Cycurion, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.28x versus 0.08x for Cycurion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.28x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    CYCU
    Cycurion, Inc.
    0.08x 6.05x $3.8M -$3.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or DAIC?

    CID Holdco, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of -541.63%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat CID Holdco, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    DAIC
    CID Holdco, Inc.
    35.77% -$0.15 -$1.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or DAIC?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.65, signalling upside risk potential of 0.36%. On the other hand CID Holdco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Confluent, Inc. has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, Inc., analysts believe Confluent, Inc. is more attractive than CID Holdco, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    3 24 0
    DAIC
    CID Holdco, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is CFLT or DAIC More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or DAIC?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or DAIC?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than CID Holdco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $778.5K. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than CID Holdco, Inc.'s net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CID Holdco, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.28x versus 7.73x for CID Holdco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.28x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    DAIC
    CID Holdco, Inc.
    7.73x -- $778.5K -$4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or IBM?

    International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 10.68%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    56.78% $1.84 $94.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.65, signalling upside risk potential of 0.36%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $305.16 which suggests that it could grow by 3.84%. Given that International Business Machines Corp. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe International Business Machines Corp. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    3 24 0
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    9 7 2
  • Is CFLT or IBM More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.088%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or IBM?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.28x versus 4.25x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.28x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    IBM
    International Business Machines Corp.
    4.25x 35.15x $16.3B $1.7B
  • Which has Higher Returns CFLT or SNCR?

    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -22.28% compared to Confluent, Inc.'s net margin of 13.84%. Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79% beat Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    74.11% -$0.19 $2.2B
    SNCR
    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
    68.76% $0.51 $236.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CFLT or SNCR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.65, signalling upside risk potential of 0.36%. On the other hand Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.72%. Given that Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    3 24 0
    SNCR
    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
    0 1 0
  • Is CFLT or SNCR More Risky?

    Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.024%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFLT or SNCR?

    Confluent, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Confluent, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CFLT or SNCR?

    Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $42M. Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M is lower than Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $5.8M. Notably, Confluent, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Confluent, Inc. is 9.28x versus 0.56x for Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CFLT
    Confluent, Inc.
    9.28x -- $298.5M -$66.5M
    SNCR
    Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
    0.56x 20.95x $42M $5.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…

Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?

UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…

Is Palantir Stock Going to Crash?
Is Palantir Stock Going to Crash?

AI and data analytics major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has become something…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
48
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Alerts

Sell
11
CVLT alert for Jan 28

Commvault Systems, Inc. [CVLT] is down 31.22% over the past day.

Sell
44
SANM alert for Jan 28

Sanmina Corp. [SANM] is down 21.58% over the past day.

Sell
16
HUM alert for Jan 28

Humana, Inc. [HUM] is down 21.11% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock