Financhill
Buy
61

GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$85.47
Seasonality move :
6.21%
Day range:
$83.14 - $87.29
52-week range:
$37.31 - $92.57
Dividend yield:
1.34%
P/E ratio:
52.98x
P/S ratio:
4.85x
P/B ratio:
6.21x
Volume:
4.7M
Avg. volume:
7.1M
1-year change:
69.92%
Market cap:
$71.6B
Revenue:
$13.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.58

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$4.2B $0.66 24.28% 96.43% $93.31
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
$102.3B $1.77 11.03% 10.88% $281.99
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$2.3B $0.71 23.32% 21.14% $164.08
APH
Amphenol Corp.
$5.6B $0.80 43.34% 59.02% $148.15
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
$1.3B $0.76 16.85% 163.87% $147.63
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
$1.4B $0.37 30.33% 82.95% $22.67
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$83.55 $93.31 $71.6B 52.98x $0.28 1.34% 4.85x
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
$284.15 $281.99 $4.2T 38.09x $0.26 0.36% 10.25x
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$127.80 $164.08 $160.9B 48.64x $0.00 0% 19.33x
APH
Amphenol Corp.
$138.65 $148.15 $169.7B 46.22x $0.17 0.48% 8.41x
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
$193.35 $147.63 $27.3B 199.68x $0.00 0% 6.19x
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
$19.02 $22.67 $4.2B 4.65x $0.00 0% 0.84x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GLW
Corning, Inc.
44.33% 2.262 13% 0.75x
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
60.38% 0.390 2.99% 0.57x
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
-- 2.397 -- 2.48x
APH
Amphenol Corp.
39.19% 1.541 5.46% 1.43x
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
36.28% 3.020 12.09% 2.25x
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
116.84% 4.779 157.09% 1.42x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$1.5B $634M 7.51% 13.07% 15.46% $450M
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
$48.3B $32.4B 65.26% 169.68% 31.65% $26.5B
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$1.5B $978.2M 32.13% 32.17% 42.38% $1.2B
APH
Amphenol Corp.
$2.4B $1.7B 21.4% 35.69% 27.48% $1.2B
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
$469.7M $75.3M 3.2% 5.01% 6.18% $134.6M
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
$616.1M $314.1M 5.48% -- 19.27% $135M

Corning, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or AAPL?

    Apple, Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 26.81%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 169.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
    AAPL
    Apple, Inc.
    47.18% $1.85 $186.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or AAPL?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.31, signalling upside risk potential of 11.68%. On the other hand Apple, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $281.99 which suggests that it could fall by -0.76%. Given that Corning, Inc. has higher upside potential than Apple, Inc., analysts believe Corning, Inc. is more attractive than Apple, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
    AAPL
    Apple, Inc.
    24 15 1
  • Is GLW or AAPL More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.527%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or AAPL?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Apple, Inc. offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc. pays out 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or AAPL?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues of $102.5B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than Apple, Inc.'s net income of $27.5B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.98x while Apple, Inc.'s PE ratio is 38.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 4.85x versus 10.25x for Apple, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    4.85x 52.98x $4.1B $470M
    AAPL
    Apple, Inc.
    10.25x 38.09x $102.5B $27.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or ANET?

    Arista Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 36.95%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Arista Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    64.56% $0.67 $11.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or ANET?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.31, signalling upside risk potential of 11.68%. On the other hand Arista Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $164.08 which suggests that it could grow by 28.39%. Given that Arista Networks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Arista Networks, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    18 4 0
  • Is GLW or ANET More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arista Networks, Inc. has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.055%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or ANET?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Arista Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Arista Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or ANET?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Arista Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than Arista Networks, Inc.'s net income of $853M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.98x while Arista Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 4.85x versus 19.33x for Arista Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    4.85x 52.98x $4.1B $470M
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    19.33x 48.64x $2.3B $853M
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or APH?

    Amphenol Corp. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 20.26%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Amphenol Corp.'s return on equity of 35.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
    APH
    Amphenol Corp.
    38.09% $0.97 $20.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or APH?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.31, signalling upside risk potential of 11.68%. On the other hand Amphenol Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $148.15 which suggests that it could grow by 6.85%. Given that Corning, Inc. has higher upside potential than Amphenol Corp., analysts believe Corning, Inc. is more attractive than Amphenol Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
    APH
    Amphenol Corp.
    10 6 0
  • Is GLW or APH More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amphenol Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.828%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or APH?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Amphenol Corp. offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp. pays out 28.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or APH?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Amphenol Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than Amphenol Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.98x while Amphenol Corp.'s PE ratio is 46.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 4.85x versus 8.41x for Amphenol Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    4.85x 52.98x $4.1B $470M
    APH
    Amphenol Corp.
    8.41x 46.22x $6.2B $1.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or CIEN?

    Ciena Corp. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 4.13%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Ciena Corp.'s return on equity of 5.01%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
    CIEN
    Ciena Corp.
    38.52% $0.35 $4.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or CIEN?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.31, signalling upside risk potential of 11.68%. On the other hand Ciena Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $147.63 which suggests that it could fall by -21.06%. Given that Corning, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ciena Corp., analysts believe Corning, Inc. is more attractive than Ciena Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
    CIEN
    Ciena Corp.
    7 4 0
  • Is GLW or CIEN More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciena Corp. has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.322%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or CIEN?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Ciena Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Ciena Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or CIEN?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Ciena Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than Ciena Corp.'s net income of $50.3M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.98x while Ciena Corp.'s PE ratio is 199.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 4.85x versus 6.19x for Ciena Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    4.85x 52.98x $4.1B $470M
    CIEN
    Ciena Corp.
    6.19x 199.68x $1.2B $50.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or COMM?

    CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 6.56%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat CommScope Holding Co., Inc.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    36.39% $0.50 $21.2B
    COMM
    CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
    37.81% $0.33 $6.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or COMM?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $93.31, signalling upside risk potential of 11.68%. On the other hand CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.17%. Given that CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe CommScope Holding Co., Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 2 1
    COMM
    CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
    2 1 0
  • Is GLW or COMM More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has a beta of 2.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.378%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or COMM?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. CommScope Holding Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or COMM?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than CommScope Holding Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than CommScope Holding Co., Inc.'s net income of $106.9M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.98x while CommScope Holding Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 4.85x versus 0.84x for CommScope Holding Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    4.85x 52.98x $4.1B $470M
    COMM
    CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
    0.84x 4.65x $1.6B $106.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4

Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.

Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4

Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock