GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of 36.89%. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.46, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $249.03 which suggests that it could grow by 61.7%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.474%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Corning's net income of $310M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 73.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 2.78x versus 13.50x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of -0.88%. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.46, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Intel.

Corning has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Intel offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Corning's net income of $310M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 2.78x versus 1.81x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

M-Tron Industries has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of --. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat M-Tron Industries's return on equity of --.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.46, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand M-Tron Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.09%. Given that M-Tron Industries has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe M-Tron Industries is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M-Tron Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. M-Tron Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. M-Tron Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than M-Tron Industries quarterly revenues of --. Corning's net income of $310M is higher than M-Tron Industries's net income of --. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while M-Tron Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 2.78x versus 8.34x for M-Tron Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Corning's net margin of 56.17%. Corning's return on equity of 4.45% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $55.46, signalling upside risk potential of 31.13%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $170.01 which suggests that it could grow by 67.01%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.031, which suggesting that the stock is 3.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Corning pays 194.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning's is not.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Corning's net income of $310M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.91x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 34.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 2.78x versus 19.35x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.