Financhill
Buy
75

GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$103.32
Seasonality move :
5.32%
Day range:
$101.86 - $107.64
52-week range:
$37.31 - $113.99
Dividend yield:
1.09%
P/E ratio:
56.15x
P/S ratio:
5.73x
P/B ratio:
7.50x
Volume:
13.4M
Avg. volume:
6.8M
1-year change:
106.54%
Market cap:
$88.5B
Revenue:
$15.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.84

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$4.4B $0.71 23.8% 277.19% $112.54
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
$138.5B $2.67 14.25% 18.76% $287.82
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$2.4B $0.76 22.69% 18.76% $164.87
APH
Amphenol Corp.
$6.2B $0.94 46.05% 60.82% $165.15
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
$1.4B $1.16 30.13% 280.45% $237.13
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$65.6B $1.52 66.66% 70.31% $253.19
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$103.25 $112.54 $88.5B 56.15x $0.28 1.09% 5.73x
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
$259.48 $287.82 $3.8T 32.83x $0.26 0.4% 8.89x
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$141.74 $164.87 $178.5B 53.94x $0.00 0% 21.43x
APH
Amphenol Corp.
$144.08 $165.15 $176.4B 43.12x $0.25 0.52% 7.97x
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
$251.81 $237.13 $35.5B 296.42x $0.00 0% 7.67x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$191.13 $253.19 $4.6T 47.34x $0.01 0.02% 25.11x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GLW
Corning, Inc.
41.67% 2.264 11.16% 0.76x
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
50.65% 0.618 2.26% 0.66x
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
-- 2.899 -- 2.48x
APH
Amphenol Corp.
53.61% 1.481 9.55% 2.39x
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
37.33% 3.674 6.07% 1.87x
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.34% 2.585 0.22% 3.60x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GLW
Corning, Inc.
$1.5B $698M 8.67% 15% 16.56% $620M
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
$69.2B $50.9B 68.41% 162.99% 35.37% $51.6B
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
$1.5B $978.2M 32.13% 32.17% 42.38% $1.2B
APH
Amphenol Corp.
$2.5B $1.8B 20.69% 37.15% 27.49% $1.5B
CIEN
Ciena Corp.
$543.6M $118.5M 2.81% 4.44% 8.76% $325.6M
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
$41.8B $36B 99.14% 110.69% 63.17% $22.1B

Corning, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or AAPL?

    Apple, Inc. has a net margin of 13.93% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 29.28%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 15% beat Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 162.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    35.26% $0.62 $20.7B
    AAPL
    Apple, Inc.
    48.16% $2.84 $178.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or AAPL?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.54, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Apple, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $287.82 which suggests that it could grow by 10.92%. Given that Apple, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Apple, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 3 0
    AAPL
    Apple, Inc.
    23 16 1
  • Is GLW or AAPL More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.21%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or AAPL?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Apple, Inc. offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 61.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc. pays out 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or AAPL?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues of $143.8B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $587M is lower than Apple, Inc.'s net income of $42.1B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.15x while Apple, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.73x versus 8.89x for Apple, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.73x 56.15x $4.2B $587M
    AAPL
    Apple, Inc.
    8.89x 32.83x $143.8B $42.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or ANET?

    Arista Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 13.93% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 36.95%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 15% beat Arista Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    35.26% $0.62 $20.7B
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    64.56% $0.67 $11.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or ANET?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.54, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Arista Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $164.87 which suggests that it could grow by 16.32%. Given that Arista Networks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Arista Networks, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 3 0
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    18 4 0
  • Is GLW or ANET More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arista Networks, Inc. has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.342%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or ANET?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Arista Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 61.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Arista Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corning, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or ANET?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Arista Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $587M is lower than Arista Networks, Inc.'s net income of $853M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.15x while Arista Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.73x versus 21.43x for Arista Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.73x 56.15x $4.2B $587M
    ANET
    Arista Networks, Inc.
    21.43x 53.94x $2.3B $853M
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or APH?

    Amphenol Corp. has a net margin of 13.93% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 18.72%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 15% beat Amphenol Corp.'s return on equity of 37.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    35.26% $0.62 $20.7B
    APH
    Amphenol Corp.
    38.22% $0.93 $29B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or APH?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.54, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Amphenol Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $165.15 which suggests that it could grow by 14.63%. Given that Amphenol Corp. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Amphenol Corp. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 3 0
    APH
    Amphenol Corp.
    10 4 0
  • Is GLW or APH More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amphenol Corp. has a beta of 1.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.682%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or APH?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Amphenol Corp. offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 61.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp. pays out 22.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or APH?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Amphenol Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $587M is lower than Amphenol Corp.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.15x while Amphenol Corp.'s PE ratio is 43.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.73x versus 7.97x for Amphenol Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.73x 56.15x $4.2B $587M
    APH
    Amphenol Corp.
    7.97x 43.12x $6.4B $1.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or CIEN?

    Ciena Corp. has a net margin of 13.93% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 1.44%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 15% beat Ciena Corp.'s return on equity of 4.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    35.26% $0.62 $20.7B
    CIEN
    Ciena Corp.
    40.21% $0.13 $4.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or CIEN?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.54, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand Ciena Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $237.13 which suggests that it could fall by -5.83%. Given that Corning, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ciena Corp., analysts believe Corning, Inc. is more attractive than Ciena Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 3 0
    CIEN
    Ciena Corp.
    5 6 1
  • Is GLW or CIEN More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciena Corp. has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.3%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or CIEN?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Ciena Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 61.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Ciena Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corning, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or CIEN?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Ciena Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $587M is higher than Ciena Corp.'s net income of $19.5M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.15x while Ciena Corp.'s PE ratio is 296.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.73x versus 7.67x for Ciena Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.73x 56.15x $4.2B $587M
    CIEN
    Ciena Corp.
    7.67x 296.42x $1.4B $19.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns GLW or NVDA?

    NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 13.93% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 15% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    35.26% $0.62 $20.7B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    73.41% $1.30 $129.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About GLW or NVDA?

    Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $112.54, signalling upside risk potential of 9%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.19 which suggests that it could grow by 32.47%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    10 3 0
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    48 3 1
  • Is GLW or NVDA More Risky?

    Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or NVDA?

    Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 61.2% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or NVDA?

    Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $587M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.15x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.73x versus 25.11x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GLW
    Corning, Inc.
    5.73x 56.15x $4.2B $587M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA Corp.
    25.11x 47.34x $57B $31.9B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?

Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…

Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…

Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?

UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Alerts

Sell
40
GDXU alert for Jan 31

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 38.85% over the past day.

Sell
34
PFSI alert for Jan 31

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 33.21% over the past day.

Sell
40
SHNY alert for Jan 31

MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 31.56% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock