Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
71
GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$89.83
Seasonality move
:
10.56%
Day range:
$89.09 - $89.97
52-week range:
$37.31 - $96.64
Dividend yield:
1.25%
P/E ratio:
56.86x
P/S ratio:
5.21x
P/B ratio:
6.66x
Volume:
1.7M
Avg. volume:
6.8M
1-year change:
87.18%
Market cap:
$76.9B
Revenue:
$13.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.58
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLW
Corning, Inc.
|
$4.2B | $0.66 | 24.28% | 96.43% | $94.54 |
|
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
|
$102.3B | $1.77 | 11.23% | 11.19% | $287.71 |
|
APH
Amphenol Corp.
|
$5.6B | $0.80 | 43.4% | 59.07% | $150.43 |
|
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
|
$1.4B | $0.37 | 30.33% | 82.95% | $24.25 |
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
$1.7B | $0.39 | -1.44% | 21.94% | $39.62 |
|
UI
Ubiquiti, Inc.
|
$702.4M | $2.93 | 19.52% | 36.1% | $587.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLW
Corning, Inc.
|
$89.66 | $94.54 | $76.9B | 56.86x | $0.28 | 1.25% | 5.21x |
|
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
|
$273.82 | $287.71 | $4T | 36.71x | $0.26 | 0.38% | 9.87x |
|
APH
Amphenol Corp.
|
$137.94 | $150.43 | $168.8B | 45.98x | $0.25 | 0.54% | 8.37x |
|
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
|
$18.09 | $24.25 | $4B | 4.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.80x |
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
$35.75 | $39.62 | $19.9B | 29.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.93x |
|
UI
Ubiquiti, Inc.
|
$571.23 | $587.50 | $34.6B | 43.68x | $0.80 | 0.49% | 12.54x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLW
Corning, Inc.
|
44.33% | 2.262 | 13% | 0.75x |
|
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
|
60.38% | 0.390 | 2.99% | 0.57x |
|
APH
Amphenol Corp.
|
39.19% | 1.541 | 5.46% | 1.43x |
|
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
|
116.84% | 4.779 | 157.09% | 1.42x |
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
12.43% | 0.801 | 8.33% | 1.96x |
|
UI
Ubiquiti, Inc.
|
17.7% | 3.217 | 0.45% | 0.76x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLW
Corning, Inc.
|
$1.5B | $634M | 7.51% | 13.07% | 15.46% | $450M |
|
AAPL
Apple, Inc.
|
$48.3B | $32.4B | 65.26% | 169.68% | 31.65% | $26.5B |
|
APH
Amphenol Corp.
|
$2.4B | $1.7B | 21.4% | 35.69% | 27.48% | $1.2B |
|
COMM
CommScope Holding Co., Inc.
|
$616.1M | $314.1M | 5.48% | -- | 19.27% | $135M |
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
$419M | $195M | -0.31% | -0.36% | 11.55% | $406M |
|
UI
Ubiquiti, Inc.
|
$337.4M | $261.7M | 91.6% | 164.18% | 35.67% | $193.3M |
Corning, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GLW or AAPL?
Apple, Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 26.81%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 169.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLWCorning, Inc.36.39% $0.50 $21.2B AAPLApple, Inc.47.18% $1.85 $186.1B -
What do Analysts Say About GLW or AAPL?
Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $94.54, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Apple, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $287.71 which suggests that it could grow by 5.64%. Given that Apple, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Apple, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLWCorning, Inc.10 2 1 AAPLApple, Inc.24 15 1 -
Is GLW or AAPL More Risky?
Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.527%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or AAPL?
Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Apple, Inc. offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc. pays out 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or AAPL?
Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues of $102.5B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than Apple, Inc.'s net income of $27.5B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.86x while Apple, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.21x versus 9.87x for Apple, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLWCorning, Inc.5.21x 56.86x $4.1B $470M AAPLApple, Inc.9.87x 36.71x $102.5B $27.5B
-
Which has Higher Returns GLW or APH?
Amphenol Corp. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 20.26%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Amphenol Corp.'s return on equity of 35.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLWCorning, Inc.36.39% $0.50 $21.2B APHAmphenol Corp.38.09% $0.97 $20.7B -
What do Analysts Say About GLW or APH?
Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $94.54, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Amphenol Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $150.43 which suggests that it could grow by 9.71%. Given that Amphenol Corp. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Amphenol Corp. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLWCorning, Inc.10 2 1 APHAmphenol Corp.10 6 0 -
Is GLW or APH More Risky?
Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amphenol Corp. has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.828%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or APH?
Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Amphenol Corp. offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp. pays out 28.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or APH?
Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Amphenol Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than Amphenol Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.86x while Amphenol Corp.'s PE ratio is 45.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.21x versus 8.37x for Amphenol Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLWCorning, Inc.5.21x 56.86x $4.1B $470M APHAmphenol Corp.8.37x 45.98x $6.2B $1.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns GLW or COMM?
CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 6.56%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat CommScope Holding Co., Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLWCorning, Inc.36.39% $0.50 $21.2B COMMCommScope Holding Co., Inc.37.81% $0.33 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GLW or COMM?
Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $94.54, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.25 which suggests that it could grow by 34.05%. Given that CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe CommScope Holding Co., Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLWCorning, Inc.10 2 1 COMMCommScope Holding Co., Inc.2 1 0 -
Is GLW or COMM More Risky?
Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding Co., Inc. has a beta of 2.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.378%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or COMM?
Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. CommScope Holding Co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding Co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or COMM?
Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than CommScope Holding Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than CommScope Holding Co., Inc.'s net income of $106.9M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.86x while CommScope Holding Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.21x versus 0.80x for CommScope Holding Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLWCorning, Inc.5.21x 56.86x $4.1B $470M COMMCommScope Holding Co., Inc.0.80x 4.65x $1.6B $106.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns GLW or GFS?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 14.75%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLWCorning, Inc.36.39% $0.50 $21.2B GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.24.82% $0.44 $13.4B -
What do Analysts Say About GLW or GFS?
Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $94.54, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.62 which suggests that it could grow by 10.82%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLWCorning, Inc.10 2 1 GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.7 11 0 -
Is GLW or GFS More Risky?
Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or GFS?
Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or GFS?
Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $249M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.86x while GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.21x versus 2.93x for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLWCorning, Inc.5.21x 56.86x $4.1B $470M GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.2.93x 29.93x $1.7B $249M
-
Which has Higher Returns GLW or UI?
Ubiquiti, Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 28.33%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Ubiquiti, Inc.'s return on equity of 164.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLWCorning, Inc.36.39% $0.50 $21.2B UIUbiquiti, Inc.45.98% $3.43 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About GLW or UI?
Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $94.54, signalling upside risk potential of 5.44%. On the other hand Ubiquiti, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $587.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that Corning, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, Inc., analysts believe Corning, Inc. is more attractive than Ubiquiti, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLWCorning, Inc.10 2 1 UIUbiquiti, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GLW or UI More Risky?
Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, which suggesting that the stock is 11.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ubiquiti, Inc. has a beta of 1.381, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.139%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLW or UI?
Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Ubiquiti, Inc. offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti, Inc. pays out 20.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLW or UI?
Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Ubiquiti, Inc. quarterly revenues of $733.8M. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than Ubiquiti, Inc.'s net income of $207.9M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.86x while Ubiquiti, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.21x versus 12.54x for Ubiquiti, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLWCorning, Inc.5.21x 56.86x $4.1B $470M UIUbiquiti, Inc.12.54x 43.68x $733.8M $207.9M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
