GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Data I/O has a net margin of -3.45% compared to Corning's net margin of -5.66%. Corning's return on equity of 1.36% beat Data I/O's return on equity of -9.05%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.88%. On the other hand Data I/O has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.29%. Given that Data I/O has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Data I/O is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Data I/O has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.353%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Data I/O offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 170.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Data I/O pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Data I/O quarterly revenues of $5.4M. Corning's net income of -$117M is lower than Data I/O's net income of -$307K. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 280.76x while Data I/O's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.26x versus 1.12x for Data I/O. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

M-Tron Industries has a net margin of -3.45% compared to Corning's net margin of --. Corning's return on equity of 1.36% beat M-Tron Industries's return on equity of --.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.88%. On the other hand M-Tron Industries has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.09%. Given that M-Tron Industries has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe M-Tron Industries is more attractive than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M-Tron Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. M-Tron Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 170.22% of its earnings as a dividend. M-Tron Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than M-Tron Industries quarterly revenues of --. Corning's net income of -$117M is higher than M-Tron Industries's net income of --. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 280.76x while M-Tron Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.26x versus 9.98x for M-Tron Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vicor has a net margin of -3.45% compared to Corning's net margin of 12.4%. Corning's return on equity of 1.36% beat Vicor's return on equity of 0.85%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.88%. On the other hand Vicor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -5.64%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Vicor, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Vicor.

Corning has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vicor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.751%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Vicor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 170.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Vicor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Vicor quarterly revenues of $93.2M. Corning's net income of -$117M is lower than Vicor's net income of $11.6M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 280.76x while Vicor's PE ratio is 547.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.26x versus 6.22x for Vicor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vuzix has a net margin of -3.45% compared to Corning's net margin of -665.53%. Corning's return on equity of 1.36% beat Vuzix's return on equity of -122.88%.

Corning has a consensus price target of $52.92, signalling upside risk potential of 10.88%. On the other hand Vuzix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -52.66%. Given that Corning has higher upside potential than Vuzix, analysts believe Corning is more attractive than Vuzix.

Corning has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.622% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vuzix has a beta of 1.620, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.951%.

Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Vuzix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning pays 170.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Vuzix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Vuzix quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Corning's net income of -$117M is lower than Vuzix's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 280.76x while Vuzix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning is 3.26x versus 49.94x for Vuzix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.