CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar, Inc. has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of 12.55%. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6% beat Caterpillar, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.22%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $613.23, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand Caterpillar, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $701.85 which suggests that it could fall by -9.58%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than Caterpillar, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar, Inc. has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.863%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Caterpillar, Inc. offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.51 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar, Inc. pays out 31.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are smaller than Caterpillar, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.1B. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M is lower than Caterpillar, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.92x while Caterpillar, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.44x versus 5.31x for Caterpillar, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Vernova, Inc. has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of 33.51%. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6% beat GE Vernova, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.71%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $613.23, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand GE Vernova, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $836.98 which suggests that it could grow by 0.8%. Given that GE Vernova, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cummins, Inc., analysts believe GE Vernova, Inc. is more attractive than Cummins, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. GE Vernova, Inc. offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova, Inc. pays out 4.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are smaller than GE Vernova, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11B. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M is lower than GE Vernova, Inc.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.92x while GE Vernova, Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.44x versus 6.02x for GE Vernova, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6% beat Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.4%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $613.23, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has a beta of 33.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3248.139%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s net income of $131.3K. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.92x while Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.44x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR, Inc. has a net margin of 7.26% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of 8.16%. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6% beat PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.76%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $613.23, signalling upside risk potential of 0.4%. On the other hand PACCAR, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $124.76 which suggests that it could fall by -3.99%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.972%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. PACCAR, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc. pays out 29.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M is higher than PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $556.9M. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.92x while PACCAR, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.44x versus 2.38x for PACCAR, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.