CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caterpillar, Inc. has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of 13.03%. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.96% beat Caterpillar, Inc.'s return on equity of 48.14%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $534.30, signalling upside risk potential of 2.38%. On the other hand Caterpillar, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $591.99 which suggests that it could grow by 1.65%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than Caterpillar, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar, Inc. has a beta of 1.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.72%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Caterpillar, Inc. offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.51 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar, Inc. pays out 25.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Caterpillar, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.6B. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $559M is lower than Caterpillar, Inc.'s net income of $2.3B. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.85x while Caterpillar, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.13x versus 4.28x for Caterpillar, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of 5.98%. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.96% beat Generac Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.02%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $534.30, signalling upside risk potential of 2.38%. On the other hand Generac Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $206.53 which suggests that it could grow by 47.66%. Given that Generac Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cummins, Inc., analysts believe Generac Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Cummins, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.816, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.615%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Generac Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Generac Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $559M is higher than Generac Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $66.6M. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.85x while Generac Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.13x versus 1.91x for Generac Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of --. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.96% beat Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.4%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $534.30, signalling upside risk potential of 2.38%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has a beta of 32.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3129.967%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $559M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s net income of $131.3K. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.85x while Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.13x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR, Inc. has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Cummins, Inc.'s net margin of 8.85%. Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.96% beat PACCAR, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.55%.

Cummins, Inc. has a consensus price target of $534.30, signalling upside risk potential of 2.38%. On the other hand PACCAR, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $111.21 which suggests that it could fall by -0.46%. Given that Cummins, Inc. has higher upside potential than PACCAR, Inc., analysts believe Cummins, Inc. is more attractive than PACCAR, Inc..

Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR, Inc. has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.025%.

Cummins, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. PACCAR, Inc. offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Cummins, Inc. pays 24.68% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR, Inc. pays out 15.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than PACCAR, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $559M is lower than PACCAR, Inc.'s net income of $590M. Notably, Cummins, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.85x while PACCAR, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins, Inc. is 2.13x versus 1.99x for PACCAR, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.