BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of 4.95%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -5.85% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $25.22, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $359.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Bloom Energy has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Bloom Energy is more attractive than Cummins.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.274, which suggesting that the stock is 227.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.555%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $572.4M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Bloom Energy's net income of $104.8M is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cummins's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.82x versus 1.17x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -219.07%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -5.85% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -76.36%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $25.22, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $23.82 which suggests that it could grow by 54.9%. Given that NuScale Power has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe NuScale Power is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.274, which suggesting that the stock is 227.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $572.4M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Bloom Energy's net income of $104.8M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$75M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.82x versus 38.71x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPI Composites has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -13.88%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -5.85% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $25.22, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of $3.26 which suggests that it could grow by 309.91%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.274, which suggesting that the stock is 227.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 2.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.556%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $572.4M, which are larger than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $346.5M. Bloom Energy's net income of $104.8M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.82x versus 0.03x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 18.31% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of 1.02%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of -5.85% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $25.22, signalling upside risk potential of 37.72%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 119.62%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.274, which suggesting that the stock is 227.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.739%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $572.4M, which are larger than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $89.9M. Bloom Energy's net income of $104.8M is higher than Twin Disc's net income of $919K. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 10.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.82x versus 0.30x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.