BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of 6.61%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 80.27%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $143.92, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $665.65 which suggests that it could grow by 6.56%. Given that Lockheed Martin Corp. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe Lockheed Martin Corp. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.177, which suggesting that the stock is 217.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.235, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.472%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 62.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 29.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 16.49x versus 1.95x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of -401.64%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.77%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $143.92, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.74 which suggests that it could grow by 13.59%. Given that Plug Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe Plug Power, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.177, which suggesting that the stock is 217.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.787, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.66%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are larger than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225.2M. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$904.6M. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 16.49x versus 4.20x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of 24.93%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Twin Disc, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.7%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $143.92, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Twin Disc, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.54%. Given that Twin Disc, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe Twin Disc, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.177, which suggesting that the stock is 217.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc, Inc. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.948%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc, Inc. offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc, Inc. pays out 142.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Twin Disc, Inc.'s is not.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are larger than Twin Disc, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.2M. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Twin Disc, Inc.'s net income of $22.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Twin Disc, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 16.49x versus 0.61x for Twin Disc, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vertiv Holdings Co. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of 15.47%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Vertiv Holdings Co.'s return on equity of 42.51%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $143.92, signalling upside risk potential of 6.11%. On the other hand Vertiv Holdings Co. has an analysts' consensus of $271.21 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that Bloom Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings Co., analysts believe Bloom Energy Corp. is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings Co..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.177, which suggesting that the stock is 217.737% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vertiv Holdings Co. has a beta of 2.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.449%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vertiv Holdings Co. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings Co. pays out 5.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are smaller than Vertiv Holdings Co. quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Vertiv Holdings Co.'s net income of $445.6M. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Vertiv Holdings Co.'s PE ratio is 77.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 16.49x versus 10.05x for Vertiv Holdings Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.