BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova, Inc. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of 33.51%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat GE Vernova, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.71%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $140.04, signalling downside risk potential of -11.92%. On the other hand GE Vernova, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $836.98 which suggests that it could grow by 0.28%. Given that GE Vernova, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe GE Vernova, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.072, which suggesting that the stock is 207.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova, Inc. offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova, Inc. pays out 4.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are smaller than GE Vernova, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11B. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than GE Vernova, Inc.'s net income of $3.7B. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while GE Vernova, Inc.'s PE ratio is 46.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 18.88x versus 6.05x for GE Vernova, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin Corp. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of 6.61%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Lockheed Martin Corp.'s return on equity of 80.27%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $140.04, signalling downside risk potential of -11.92%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $657.58 which suggests that it could fall by -2.33%. Given that Bloom Energy Corp. has more downside risk than Lockheed Martin Corp., analysts believe Lockheed Martin Corp. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.072, which suggesting that the stock is 207.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin Corp. has a beta of 0.228, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.215%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin Corp. offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.45 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin Corp. pays out 62.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Lockheed Martin Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Lockheed Martin Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 18.88x versus 2.07x for Lockheed Martin Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of -205.31%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $140.04, signalling downside risk potential of -11.92%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 43.98%. Given that Plug Power, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe Plug Power, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.072, which suggesting that the stock is 207.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.869, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.915%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are larger than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 18.88x versus 2.93x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Bloom Energy Corp.'s net margin of 24.93%. Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3% beat Twin Disc, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.7%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a consensus price target of $140.04, signalling downside risk potential of -11.92%. On the other hand Twin Disc, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.43%. Given that Twin Disc, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe Twin Disc, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.072, which suggesting that the stock is 207.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.416%.

Bloom Energy Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc, Inc. offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy Corp. pays 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc, Inc. pays out 142.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Twin Disc, Inc.'s is not.

Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues are $777.7M, which are larger than Twin Disc, Inc. quarterly revenues of $90.2M. Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Twin Disc, Inc.'s net income of $22.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28,448.94x while Twin Disc, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy Corp. is 18.88x versus 0.69x for Twin Disc, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.