FCEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloom Energy Corp. has a net margin of -85.33% compared to FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 0.18%. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.4% beat Bloom Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -13.3%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.24, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Bloom Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $143.92 which suggests that it could grow by 6.11%. Given that FuelCell Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy Corp., analysts believe FuelCell Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Bloom Energy Corp..

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 40.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloom Energy Corp. has a beta of 3.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.737%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bloom Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy, Inc. pays 2.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy Corp. pays out 5.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are smaller than Bloom Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $777.7M. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$26.1M is lower than Bloom Energy Corp.'s net income of $1.4M. Notably, FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bloom Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 28,448.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy, Inc. is 1.27x versus 16.49x for Bloom Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -85.33% compared to FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.4% beat Global Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.24, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Global Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FuelCell Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Water Technologies, Inc., analysts believe FuelCell Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Global Water Technologies, Inc..

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 40.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.556, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.407%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy, Inc. pays 2.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Water Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are larger than Global Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$26.1M is higher than Global Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy, Inc. is 1.27x versus 697.70x for Global Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of -85.33% compared to FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -401.64%. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.4% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.77%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.24, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.74 which suggests that it could grow by 13.59%. Given that FuelCell Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Plug Power, Inc., analysts believe FuelCell Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Plug Power, Inc..

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 40.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.787, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.66%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy, Inc. pays 2.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are smaller than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225.2M. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$26.1M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$904.6M. Notably, FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy, Inc. is 1.27x versus 4.20x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -85.33% compared to FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 12.94%. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.4% beat Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.86%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.24, signalling upside risk potential of 24.87%. On the other hand Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.92%. Given that FuelCell Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc., analysts believe FuelCell Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc..

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.410, which suggesting that the stock is 40.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.644%.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FuelCell Energy, Inc. pays 2.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FuelCell Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are smaller than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $61.1M. FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$26.1M is lower than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $7.9M. Notably, FuelCell Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FuelCell Energy, Inc. is 1.27x versus 1.25x for Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.