Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
47
PPIH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.31
Seasonality move
:
8.54%
Day range:
$13.00 - $14.01
52-week range:
$6.83 - $17.58
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
7.09x
P/S ratio:
0.68x
P/B ratio:
1.56x
Volume:
77.4K
Avg. volume:
54.5K
1-year change:
66.46%
Market cap:
$106.9M
Revenue:
$150.7M
EPS (TTM):
$1.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIRJ
AirJoule Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $12.00 |
|
FCEL
FuelCell Energy
|
$39.7M | -$1.60 | 76.58% | -6.04% | $10.02 |
|
MJWL
Majic Wheels
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMIO
Marmion Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCLN
OriginClear
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings
|
$13.40 | -- | $106.9M | 7.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.68x |
|
AIRJ
AirJoule Technologies
|
$9.49 | $12.00 | $530M | 1.93x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FCEL
FuelCell Energy
|
$10.42 | $10.02 | $212.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.89x |
|
MJWL
Majic Wheels
|
$0.0000 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MMIO
Marmion Industries
|
$0.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OCLN
OriginClear
|
$0.0035 | -- | $5.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 198.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings
|
25.83% | 0.366 | 28.51% | 1.25x |
|
AIRJ
AirJoule Technologies
|
-- | 2.295 | -- | -- |
|
FCEL
FuelCell Energy
|
15.89% | 3.387 | 39.74% | 4.64x |
|
MJWL
Majic Wheels
|
-- | 0.981 | -- | -- |
|
MMIO
Marmion Industries
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OCLN
OriginClear
|
-5.66% | -0.804 | 24.16% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PPIH
Perma-Pipe International Holdings
|
$13.5M | $6.1M | 17.46% | 22.41% | 16.27% | $1.3M |
|
AIRJ
AirJoule Technologies
|
-- | -$2.4M | -- | -- | -- | -$4M |
|
FCEL
FuelCell Energy
|
-$6.2M | -$33.6M | -13.11% | -15.42% | -137.44% | -$80.3M |
|
MJWL
Majic Wheels
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMIO
Marmion Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCLN
OriginClear
|
-$6.4K | -$1.3M | -- | -- | -204964.86% | -$1M |
Perma-Pipe International Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PPIH or AIRJ?
AirJoule Technologies has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 22.41% beat AirJoule Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings35.92% $0.40 $100.5M AIRJAirJoule Technologies-- $0.61 -- -
What do Analysts Say About PPIH or AIRJ?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AirJoule Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that AirJoule Technologies has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe AirJoule Technologies is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0 0 0 AIRJAirJoule Technologies0 0 0 -
Is PPIH or AIRJ More Risky?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, which suggesting that the stock is 68.271% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AirJoule Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PPIH or AIRJ?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AirJoule Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AirJoule Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PPIH or AIRJ?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $37.5M, which are larger than AirJoule Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $3.3M is lower than AirJoule Technologies's net income of $35M. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.09x while AirJoule Technologies's PE ratio is 1.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.68x versus -- for AirJoule Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0.68x 7.09x $37.5M $3.3M AIRJAirJoule Technologies-- 1.93x -- $35M
-
Which has Higher Returns PPIH or FCEL?
FuelCell Energy has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of -137.84%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 22.41% beat FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -15.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings35.92% $0.40 $100.5M FCELFuelCell Energy-26.17% -$2.10 $883.9M -
What do Analysts Say About PPIH or FCEL?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FuelCell Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.02 which suggests that it could fall by -3.83%. Given that FuelCell Energy has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe FuelCell Energy is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0 0 0 FCELFuelCell Energy0 6 1 -
Is PPIH or FCEL More Risky?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, which suggesting that the stock is 68.271% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 264.091%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PPIH or FCEL?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FuelCell Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FuelCell Energy pays out -2.98% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PPIH or FCEL?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $37.5M, which are larger than FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues of $23.7M. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than FuelCell Energy's net income of -$32.7M. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.09x while FuelCell Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.89x for FuelCell Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0.68x 7.09x $37.5M $3.3M FCELFuelCell Energy1.89x -- $23.7M -$32.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns PPIH or MJWL?
Majic Wheels has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 22.41% beat Majic Wheels's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings35.92% $0.40 $100.5M MJWLMajic Wheels-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PPIH or MJWL?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Majic Wheels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perma-Pipe International Holdings has higher upside potential than Majic Wheels, analysts believe Perma-Pipe International Holdings is more attractive than Majic Wheels.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0 0 0 MJWLMajic Wheels0 0 0 -
Is PPIH or MJWL More Risky?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, which suggesting that the stock is 68.271% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Majic Wheels has a beta of 38.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3704.975%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PPIH or MJWL?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Majic Wheels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Majic Wheels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PPIH or MJWL?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $37.5M, which are larger than Majic Wheels quarterly revenues of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than Majic Wheels's net income of --. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.09x while Majic Wheels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.68x versus -- for Majic Wheels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0.68x 7.09x $37.5M $3.3M MJWLMajic Wheels-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PPIH or MMIO?
Marmion Industries has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 22.41% beat Marmion Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings35.92% $0.40 $100.5M MMIOMarmion Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PPIH or MMIO?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marmion Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perma-Pipe International Holdings has higher upside potential than Marmion Industries, analysts believe Perma-Pipe International Holdings is more attractive than Marmion Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0 0 0 MMIOMarmion Industries0 0 0 -
Is PPIH or MMIO More Risky?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, which suggesting that the stock is 68.271% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marmion Industries has a beta of -2.212, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.213%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PPIH or MMIO?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marmion Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marmion Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PPIH or MMIO?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $37.5M, which are larger than Marmion Industries quarterly revenues of --. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than Marmion Industries's net income of --. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.09x while Marmion Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.68x versus -- for Marmion Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0.68x 7.09x $37.5M $3.3M MMIOMarmion Industries-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PPIH or OCLN?
OriginClear has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net margin of -241842.13%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 22.41% beat OriginClear's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings35.92% $0.40 $100.5M OCLNOriginClear-- -$0.00 -$51.8M -
What do Analysts Say About PPIH or OCLN?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OriginClear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 499900.57%. Given that OriginClear has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe OriginClear is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0 0 0 OCLNOriginClear0 0 0 -
Is PPIH or OCLN More Risky?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, which suggesting that the stock is 68.271% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OriginClear has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.779%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PPIH or OCLN?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OriginClear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OriginClear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PPIH or OCLN?
Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues are $37.5M, which are larger than OriginClear quarterly revenues of $6.6K. Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than OriginClear's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Perma-Pipe International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.09x while OriginClear's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Pipe International Holdings is 0.68x versus 198.13x for OriginClear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PPIHPerma-Pipe International Holdings0.68x 7.09x $37.5M $3.3M OCLNOriginClear198.13x -- $6.6K -$2.8M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
