TWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins, Inc. has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Twin Disc, Inc.'s net margin of 7.26%. Twin Disc, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.7% beat Cummins, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.6%.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand Cummins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $595.63 which suggests that it could fall by -0.22%. Given that Twin Disc, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cummins, Inc., analysts believe Twin Disc, Inc. is more attractive than Cummins, Inc..

Twin Disc, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins, Inc. has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.946%.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Cummins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Twin Disc, Inc. pays 142.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc. pays out 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Twin Disc, Inc.'s is not.

Twin Disc, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.2M, which are smaller than Cummins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Twin Disc, Inc.'s net income of $22.5M is lower than Cummins, Inc.'s net income of $620M. Notably, Twin Disc, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while Cummins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc, Inc. is 0.69x versus 2.46x for Cummins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Twin Disc, Inc.'s net margin of --. Twin Disc, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.7% beat Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.4%.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc., analysts believe Twin Disc, Inc. is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc..

Twin Disc, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. has a beta of 33.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3248.139%.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc, Inc. pays 142.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twin Disc, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.2M, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Twin Disc, Inc.'s net income of $22.5M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s net income of $131.3K. Notably, Twin Disc, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc, Inc. is 0.69x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power Corp. has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Twin Disc, Inc.'s net margin of -6462.58%. Twin Disc, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.7% beat NuScale Power Corp.'s return on equity of -194.62%.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand NuScale Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $33.96 which suggests that it could grow by 131.98%. Given that NuScale Power Corp. has higher upside potential than Twin Disc, Inc., analysts believe NuScale Power Corp. is more attractive than Twin Disc, Inc..

Twin Disc, Inc. has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power Corp. has a beta of 2.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.586%.

Twin Disc, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. NuScale Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc, Inc. pays 142.84% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twin Disc, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.2M, which are larger than NuScale Power Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Twin Disc, Inc.'s net income of $22.5M is higher than NuScale Power Corp.'s net income of -$532.6M. Notably, Twin Disc, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.21x while NuScale Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc, Inc. is 0.69x versus 29.03x for NuScale Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.