TWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of -3.79% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 9.57%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3% beat Cummins's return on equity of 19.56%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $377.16 which suggests that it could grow by 7.34%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Cummins.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.752%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Cummins offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $72.9M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Cummins's net income of $809M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while Cummins's PE ratio is 23.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.55x versus 1.44x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -3.79% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of -20.76%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.839%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $72.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.55x versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of -3.79% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of --. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 20.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1967.037%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $72.9M, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.55x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -3.79% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of -3675.58%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73%.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.147% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Twin Disc has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Disc pays 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Disc quarterly revenues are $72.9M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $475K. Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Twin Disc's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Disc is 0.55x versus 228.46x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.