CHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of -4.97% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 14.64%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 434.96%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.1%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.425, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.48%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Church & Dwight pays 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 76.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $5B. Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $737M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.58x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.32x versus 3.77x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of -4.97% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 5.62%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41% beat Clorox's return on equity of 135.23%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $146.86 which suggests that it could fall by -0.02%. Given that Church & Dwight has more downside risk than Clorox, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.102%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Clorox offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Church & Dwight pays 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M is lower than Clorox's net income of $99M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.58x while Clorox's PE ratio is 57.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.32x versus 2.74x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of -4.97% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 18.21%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $181.07 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.862%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Church & Dwight pays 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.7B. Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.58x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 28.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.32x versus 4.95x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -4.97% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 3.7%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.17%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, which suggesting that the stock is 42.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Church & Dwight pays 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.58x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.32x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.