ADSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce, Inc. has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Autodesk, Inc.'s net margin of 20.33%. Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26% beat Salesforce, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.97%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a consensus price target of $354.11, signalling upside risk potential of 56.01%. On the other hand Salesforce, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $315.23 which suggests that it could grow by 71.32%. Given that Salesforce, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Salesforce, Inc. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce, Inc. has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.8%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce, Inc. offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Autodesk, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce, Inc. pays out 25.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Salesforce, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.3B. Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M is lower than Salesforce, Inc.'s net income of $2.1B. Notably, Autodesk, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.06x while Salesforce, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk, Inc. is 7.13x versus 4.43x for Salesforce, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Autodesk, Inc.'s net margin of 47.32%. Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 34.63%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a consensus price target of $354.11, signalling upside risk potential of 56.01%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $596.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.04%. Given that Autodesk, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Autodesk, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.365%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Autodesk, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $81.3B. Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $38.5B. Notably, Autodesk, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.06x while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 24.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk, Inc. is 7.13x versus 9.70x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Atlassian Corp. has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Autodesk, Inc.'s net margin of -2.69%. Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26% beat Atlassian Corp.'s return on equity of -13.7%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a consensus price target of $354.11, signalling upside risk potential of 56.01%. On the other hand Atlassian Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $177.85 which suggests that it could grow by 134.07%. Given that Atlassian Corp. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Atlassian Corp. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlassian Corp. has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.176%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlassian Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autodesk, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atlassian Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Atlassian Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M is higher than Atlassian Corp.'s net income of -$42.6M. Notably, Autodesk, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.06x while Atlassian Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk, Inc. is 7.13x versus 3.47x for Atlassian Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday, Inc. has a net margin of 18.5% compared to Autodesk, Inc.'s net margin of 10.38%. Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26% beat Workday, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.19%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a consensus price target of $354.11, signalling upside risk potential of 56.01%. On the other hand Workday, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $243.54 which suggests that it could grow by 78.25%. Given that Workday, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Workday, Inc. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday, Inc. has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.487%.

Autodesk, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autodesk, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Workday, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M is higher than Workday, Inc.'s net income of $252M. Notably, Autodesk, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.06x while Workday, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk, Inc. is 7.13x versus 4.04x for Workday, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.