ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 4.45%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $50.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.9%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $87.43 which suggests that it could grow by 12.31%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.678%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is lower than Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.35x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 9.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus 0.21x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $50.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.9%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.446%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.35x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 3.36%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $50.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.9%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $100.25 which suggests that it could grow by 40.88%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.002%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.35x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus 0.69x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 2.64%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $50.09, signalling upside risk potential of 3.9%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $67.27 which suggests that it could grow by 6.58%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.538%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.17%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than Tyson Foods's net income of $359M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.35x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 21.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus 0.42x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.