ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 4.45%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.07%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $87.23 which suggests that it could grow by 11.61%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.739%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 33.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is lower than Bunge Global SA's net income of $602M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 9.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus 0.21x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 5.28%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 16.87%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of $145.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.537%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than Ingredion's net income of $95M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 14.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus 1.24x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.656%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Archer-Daniels Midland's net margin of 3.36%. Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.82% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a consensus price target of $49.73, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.38 which suggests that it could grow by 46.46%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.691, which suggesting that the stock is 30.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

Archer-Daniels Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels Midland pays 54.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues are $21.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $567M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Archer-Daniels Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.39x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels Midland is 0.28x versus 0.61x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.