ADM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mission Produce, Inc. has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net margin of 5.27%. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s return on equity of 5.24% beat Mission Produce, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.83%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a consensus price target of $56.90, signalling downside risk potential of -0.99%. On the other hand Mission Produce, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.33 which suggests that it could grow by 49.3%. Given that Mission Produce, Inc. has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., analysts believe Mission Produce, Inc. is more attractive than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co..

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.452% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mission Produce, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.897%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.53%. Mission Produce, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. pays 54.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Mission Produce, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than Mission Produce, Inc. quarterly revenues of $319M. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net income of $110M is higher than Mission Produce, Inc.'s net income of $16.8M. Notably, Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Mission Produce, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. is 0.34x versus 0.60x for Mission Produce, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net margin of 0.83%. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s return on equity of 5.24% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a consensus price target of $56.90, signalling downside risk potential of -0.99%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $108.44 which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co..

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.452% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.396%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.53%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. pays 54.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are smaller than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $22.2B. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net income of $110M is lower than Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M. Notably, Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 9.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. is 0.34x versus 0.22x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net margin of -821.05%. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s return on equity of 5.24% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a consensus price target of $56.90, signalling downside risk potential of -0.99%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.452% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -1.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.067%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.53%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. pays 54.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net income of $110M is higher than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. is 0.34x versus 184.10x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net margin of 7.27%. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s return on equity of 5.24% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.08%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a consensus price target of $56.90, signalling downside risk potential of -0.99%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.71 which suggests that it could grow by 29.87%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co..

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.452% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.382%.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.53%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. pays 54.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $733.5M. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net income of $110M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $53.3M. Notably, Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. is 0.34x versus 0.55x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.