BG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingredion, Inc. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 9.47%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat Ingredion, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $105.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand Ingredion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $124.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Ingredion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bunge Global SA, analysts believe Ingredion, Inc. is more attractive than Bunge Global SA.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.613%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Ingredion, Inc. offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion, Inc. pays out 32.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than Ingredion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is higher than Ingredion, Inc.'s net income of $172M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.24x while Ingredion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.24x versus 0.99x for Ingredion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kellanova has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 9.63%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat Kellanova's return on equity of 32.05%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $105.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand Kellanova has an analysts' consensus of $83.39 which suggests that it could grow by 0.3%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Kellanova.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kellanova has a beta of 0.236, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.436%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Kellanova offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova pays out 58.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than Kellanova quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is lower than Kellanova's net income of $314M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.24x while Kellanova's PE ratio is 22.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.24x versus 2.30x for Kellanova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altria Group, Inc. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 45.12%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat Altria Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $105.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand Altria Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $62.58 which suggests that it could grow by 7.15%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Altria Group, Inc., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Altria Group, Inc..

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.096%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Altria Group, Inc. offers a yield of 7.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group, Inc. pays out 61.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than Altria Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is lower than Altria Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.4B. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.24x while Altria Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.24x versus 4.89x for Altria Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMeWorld Ltd. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of --. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat UMeWorld Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $105.67, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand UMeWorld Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than UMeWorld Ltd., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than UMeWorld Ltd..

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMeWorld Ltd. has a beta of -1.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 290.615%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. UMeWorld Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. UMeWorld Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than UMeWorld Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is higher than UMeWorld Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.24x while UMeWorld Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.24x versus 4,072.92x for UMeWorld Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.