ADI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel Corp. has a net margin of 25.61% compared to Analog Devices, Inc.'s net margin of 31.28%. Analog Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.19%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a consensus price target of $285.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.3%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $38.14 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that Analog Devices, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intel Corp., analysts believe Analog Devices, Inc. is more attractive than Intel Corp..

Analog Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.357%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Analog Devices, Inc. pays 85.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Analog Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. Analog Devices, Inc.'s net income of $787.7M is lower than Intel Corp.'s net income of $4.3B. Notably, Analog Devices, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.35x while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 3,481.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices, Inc. is 12.22x versus 3.03x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA Corp. has a net margin of 25.61% compared to Analog Devices, Inc.'s net margin of 34.93%. Analog Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 101.72%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a consensus price target of $285.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.3%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,320.96 which suggests that it could grow by 8.71%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than Analog Devices, Inc..

Analog Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.735%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Analog Devices, Inc. pays 85.22% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Analog Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Analog Devices, Inc.'s net income of $787.7M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Analog Devices, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.35x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 38.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices, Inc. is 12.22x versus 12.92x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 25.61% compared to Analog Devices, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Analog Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat Microchip Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.81%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a consensus price target of $285.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.3%. On the other hand Microchip Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.24 which suggests that it could grow by 18.08%. Given that Microchip Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, Inc., analysts believe Microchip Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Analog Devices, Inc..

Analog Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.741%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Microchip Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Analog Devices, Inc. pays 85.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology, Inc. pays out 195140% of its earnings as a dividend. Analog Devices, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Microchip Technology, Inc.'s is not.

Analog Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Microchip Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Analog Devices, Inc.'s net income of $787.7M is higher than Microchip Technology, Inc.'s net income of $41.7M. Notably, Analog Devices, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.35x while Microchip Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 87.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices, Inc. is 12.22x versus 8.17x for Microchip Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 25.61% compared to Analog Devices, Inc.'s net margin of 91.65%. Analog Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.55% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.3%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a consensus price target of $285.56, signalling upside risk potential of 5.3%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $116.58 which suggests that it could grow by 37.19%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Analog Devices, Inc..

Analog Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.947, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.682%.

Analog Devices, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Analog Devices, Inc. pays 85.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Analog Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Analog Devices, Inc.'s net income of $787.7M is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Analog Devices, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 59.35x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices, Inc. is 12.22x versus 9.51x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.