AAPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cisco Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 26.81% compared to Apple, Inc.'s net margin of 19.22%. Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 169.68% beat Cisco Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 23%.

Apple, Inc. has a consensus price target of $281.99, signalling downside risk potential of -0.76%. On the other hand Cisco Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $84.81 which suggests that it could grow by 9.09%. Given that Cisco Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Apple, Inc., analysts believe Cisco Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Apple, Inc..

Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.527% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.781%.

Apple, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Cisco Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Apple, Inc. pays 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems, Inc. pays out 63.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues are $102.5B, which are larger than Cisco Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Apple, Inc.'s net income of $27.5B is higher than Cisco Systems, Inc.'s net income of $2.9B. Notably, Apple, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.09x while Cisco Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple, Inc. is 10.25x versus 5.39x for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jamf Holding Corp. has a net margin of 26.81% compared to Apple, Inc.'s net margin of -2.46%. Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 169.68% beat Jamf Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -5.51%.

Apple, Inc. has a consensus price target of $281.99, signalling downside risk potential of -0.76%. On the other hand Jamf Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.01 which suggests that it could fall by -7.37%. Given that Jamf Holding Corp. has more downside risk than Apple, Inc., analysts believe Apple, Inc. is more attractive than Jamf Holding Corp..

Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.527% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jamf Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.289%.

Apple, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Jamf Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple, Inc. pays 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Jamf Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues are $102.5B, which are larger than Jamf Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $183.5M. Apple, Inc.'s net income of $27.5B is higher than Jamf Holding Corp.'s net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Apple, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.09x while Jamf Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple, Inc. is 10.25x versus 2.51x for Jamf Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of 26.81% compared to Apple, Inc.'s net margin of 35.72%. Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 169.68% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4%.

Apple, Inc. has a consensus price target of $281.99, signalling downside risk potential of -0.76%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $625.41 which suggests that it could grow by 30.91%. Given that Microsoft Corp. has higher upside potential than Apple, Inc., analysts believe Microsoft Corp. is more attractive than Apple, Inc..

Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.527% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.205%.

Apple, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Apple, Inc. pays 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues are $102.5B, which are larger than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $77.7B. Apple, Inc.'s net income of $27.5B is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B. Notably, Apple, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.09x while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple, Inc. is 10.25x versus 12.14x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy, Inc. has a net margin of 26.81% compared to Apple, Inc.'s net margin of -3797.18%. Apple, Inc.'s return on equity of 169.68% beat Strategy, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.14%.

Apple, Inc. has a consensus price target of $281.99, signalling downside risk potential of -0.76%. On the other hand Strategy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $517.21 which suggests that it could grow by 174.55%. Given that Strategy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Apple, Inc., analysts believe Strategy, Inc. is more attractive than Apple, Inc..

Apple, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.527% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy, Inc. has a beta of 3.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 239.712%.

Apple, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Strategy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple, Inc. pays 13.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apple, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple, Inc. quarterly revenues are $102.5B, which are larger than Strategy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $128.7M. Apple, Inc.'s net income of $27.5B is higher than Strategy, Inc.'s net income of $2.8B. Notably, Apple, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 38.09x while Strategy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple, Inc. is 10.25x versus 109.10x for Strategy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.