AAPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cisco Systems has a net margin of 29.23% compared to Apple's net margin of 17.35%. Apple's return on equity of 141.94% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $252.21, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $70.37 which suggests that it could grow by 16.31%. Given that Apple has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe Apple is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Apple has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.103%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $124.3B, which are larger than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $14B. Apple's net income of $36.3B is higher than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.89x while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 26.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 8.25x versus 4.50x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 29.23% compared to Apple's net margin of -0.88%. Apple's return on equity of 141.94% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $252.21, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -4.79%. Given that Apple has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Apple is more attractive than Intel.

Apple has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Intel offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $124.3B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Apple's net income of $36.3B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.89x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 8.25x versus 1.94x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 29.23% compared to Apple's net margin of 11.02%. Apple's return on equity of 141.94% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $252.21, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.96 which suggests that it could grow by 65.78%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Apple, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Apple.

Apple has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $124.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Apple's net income of $36.3B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.89x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 8.25x versus 10.32x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 29.23% compared to Apple's net margin of 5.65%. Apple's return on equity of 141.94% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 28.1%.

Apple has a consensus price target of $252.21, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $52.34 which suggests that it could grow by 24.11%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than Apple, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than Apple.

Apple has a beta of 1.180, which suggesting that the stock is 17.974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.827%.

Apple has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple pays 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apple's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apple quarterly revenues are $124.3B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Apple's net income of $36.3B is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $320.6M. Notably, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.89x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple is 8.25x versus 1.28x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.