ASTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtran Holdings has a net margin of -1869.5% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -18.91%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -78.42% beat Adtran Holdings's return on equity of -62.59%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 83.88%. On the other hand Adtran Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.20 which suggests that it could grow by 77.18%. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Adtran Holdings, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Adtran Holdings.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.811, which suggesting that the stock is 81.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtran Holdings has a beta of 1.456, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.601%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adtran Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adtran Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Adtran Holdings quarterly revenues of $242.9M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$35.9M is higher than Adtran Holdings's net income of -$45.9M. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Adtran Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 782.77x versus 0.64x for Adtran Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a net margin of -1869.5% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 7.98%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -78.42% beat Hewlett Packard Enterprise's return on equity of 12.2%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 83.88%. On the other hand Hewlett Packard Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of $19.48 which suggests that it could grow by 30.89%. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Hewlett Packard Enterprise, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.811, which suggesting that the stock is 81.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.104%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hewlett Packard Enterprise offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise pays out 26.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Hewlett Packard Enterprise quarterly revenues of $7.9B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$35.9M is lower than Hewlett Packard Enterprise's net income of $627M. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hewlett Packard Enterprise's PE ratio is 7.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 782.77x versus 0.65x for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -1869.5% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -15.32%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -78.42% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -26.11%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 83.88%. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.811, which suggesting that the stock is 81.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.4M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$35.9M is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$527K. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 782.77x versus 0.31x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -1869.5% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 56.17%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -78.42% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $41.17, signalling upside risk potential of 83.88%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $167.33 which suggests that it could grow by 60.14%. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than NVIDIA.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.811, which suggesting that the stock is 81.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$35.9M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 35.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 782.77x versus 19.86x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.