ASTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aviat Networks has a net margin of -15631.46% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -13.43%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -96.7% beat Aviat Networks's return on equity of -2.06%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $35.94, signalling upside risk potential of 48.88%. On the other hand Aviat Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 78.02%. Given that Aviat Networks has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Aviat Networks is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aviat Networks has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.638%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aviat Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aviat Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Aviat Networks quarterly revenues of $88.4M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$171.9M is lower than Aviat Networks's net income of -$11.9M. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aviat Networks's PE ratio is 29.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is -- versus 0.60x for Aviat Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cisco Systems has a net margin of -15631.46% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 19.59%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -96.7% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.6%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $35.94, signalling upside risk potential of 48.88%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $62.79 which suggests that it could grow by 6.84%. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.86%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $13.8B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$171.9M is lower than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.7B. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 25.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is -- versus 4.49x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -15631.46% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -0.48%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -96.7% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -27.93%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $35.94, signalling upside risk potential of 48.88%. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.3M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$171.9M is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$25K. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is -- versus 0.47x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -15631.46% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 55.04%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -96.7% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $35.94, signalling upside risk potential of 48.88%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.64%. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than NVIDIA.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$171.9M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 58.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is -- versus 32.80x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.