ASTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel Corp. has a net margin of -1111.52% compared to AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net margin of -2.44%. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.99% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.02%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.64, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.62 which suggests that it could fall by -4.43%. Given that AST Spacemobile, Inc. has more downside risk than Intel Corp., analysts believe Intel Corp. is more attractive than AST Spacemobile, Inc..

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a beta of 2.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.797% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.357%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. AST Spacemobile, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net income of -$163.8M is higher than Intel Corp.'s net income of -$333M. Notably, AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 5,117.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST Spacemobile, Inc. is 1,534.12x versus 4.18x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -1111.52% compared to AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.99% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.64, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $358.85 which suggests that it could fall by -17.56%. Given that AST Spacemobile, Inc. has more downside risk than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe Micron Technology, Inc. is more attractive than AST Spacemobile, Inc..

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a beta of 2.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.797% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.087%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. AST Spacemobile, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net income of -$163.8M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST Spacemobile, Inc. is 1,534.12x versus 11.62x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of -1111.52% compared to AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.99% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.64, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.19 which suggests that it could grow by 32.2%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than AST Spacemobile, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than AST Spacemobile, Inc..

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a beta of 2.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.797% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AST Spacemobile, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net income of -$163.8M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 47.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST Spacemobile, Inc. is 1,534.12x versus 25.16x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ViaSat, Inc. has a net margin of -1111.52% compared to AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net margin of -4.54%. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.99% beat ViaSat, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.29%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a consensus price target of $81.64, signalling downside risk potential of -32.66%. On the other hand ViaSat, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.13 which suggests that it could fall by -13.57%. Given that AST Spacemobile, Inc. has more downside risk than ViaSat, Inc., analysts believe ViaSat, Inc. is more attractive than AST Spacemobile, Inc..

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a beta of 2.698, which suggesting that the stock is 169.797% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ViaSat, Inc. has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.208%.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ViaSat, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST Spacemobile, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ViaSat, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than ViaSat, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net income of -$163.8M is lower than ViaSat, Inc.'s net income of -$51.8M. Notably, AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ViaSat, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST Spacemobile, Inc. is 1,534.12x versus 1.36x for ViaSat, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.