ZHEXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Zhejiang Expressway's net margin of 0.04%. Zhejiang Expressway's return on equity of -- beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than Zhejiang Expressway, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than Zhejiang Expressway.

Zhejiang Expressway has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.91%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zhejiang Expressway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zhejiang Expressway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Zhejiang Expressway's net income of -- is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, Zhejiang Expressway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zhejiang Expressway is 1.39x versus 0.45x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Zhejiang Expressway's net margin of -37.51%. Zhejiang Expressway's return on equity of -- beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 51.89%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than Zhejiang Expressway, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than Zhejiang Expressway.

Zhejiang Expressway has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.982%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.91%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zhejiang Expressway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zhejiang Expressway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Zhejiang Expressway's net income of -- is lower than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Zhejiang Expressway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zhejiang Expressway is 1.39x versus 21.46x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -- compared to Zhejiang Expressway's net margin of --. Zhejiang Expressway's return on equity of -- beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1365.38%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than Zhejiang Expressway, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than Zhejiang Expressway.

Zhejiang Expressway has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.91%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zhejiang Expressway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zhejiang Expressway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. Zhejiang Expressway's net income of -- is lower than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, Zhejiang Expressway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zhejiang Expressway is 1.39x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Zhejiang Expressway's net margin of --. Zhejiang Expressway's return on equity of -- beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

Zhejiang Expressway has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zhejiang Expressway has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Zhejiang Expressway is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

Zhejiang Expressway has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.468% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zhejiang Expressway has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.91%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zhejiang Expressway pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zhejiang Expressway quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Zhejiang Expressway's net income of -- is lower than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Zhejiang Expressway's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zhejiang Expressway is 1.39x versus 0.06x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.