WIPKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of 12.9% compared to Winpak Ltd.'s net margin of --. Winpak Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.33% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Winpak Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Winpak Ltd. has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe Winpak Ltd. is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..

Winpak Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.

Winpak Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winpak Ltd. pays 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winpak Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winpak Ltd. quarterly revenues are $283M, which are larger than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Winpak Ltd.'s net income of $36.5M is higher than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Winpak Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winpak Ltd. is 1.70x versus 0.15x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of 12.9% compared to Winpak Ltd.'s net margin of 21.85%. Winpak Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.33% beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Winpak Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $269.79 which suggests that it could grow by 2.04%. Given that Expedia Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winpak Ltd., analysts believe Expedia Group, Inc. is more attractive than Winpak Ltd..

Winpak Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.941%.

Winpak Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Winpak Ltd. pays 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winpak Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winpak Ltd. quarterly revenues are $283M, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Winpak Ltd.'s net income of $36.5M is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Winpak Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winpak Ltd. is 1.70x versus 2.43x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

lululemon athletica, Inc. has a net margin of 12.9% compared to Winpak Ltd.'s net margin of 14.69%. Winpak Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.33% beat lululemon athletica, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.48%.

Winpak Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand lululemon athletica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $190.19 which suggests that it could grow by 3.91%. Given that lululemon athletica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winpak Ltd., analysts believe lululemon athletica, Inc. is more attractive than Winpak Ltd..

Winpak Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison lululemon athletica, Inc. has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.107%.

Winpak Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. lululemon athletica, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winpak Ltd. pays 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. lululemon athletica, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winpak Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winpak Ltd. quarterly revenues are $283M, which are smaller than lululemon athletica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Winpak Ltd.'s net income of $36.5M is lower than lululemon athletica, Inc.'s net income of $370.9M. Notably, Winpak Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while lululemon athletica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winpak Ltd. is 1.70x versus 2.04x for lululemon athletica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sealed Air Corp. has a net margin of 12.9% compared to Winpak Ltd.'s net margin of 13.74%. Winpak Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.33% beat Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7%.

Winpak Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sealed Air Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.55%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Winpak Ltd., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Winpak Ltd..

Winpak Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.343%.

Winpak Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.46%. Sealed Air Corp. offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Winpak Ltd. pays 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp. pays out 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Winpak Ltd. quarterly revenues are $283M, which are smaller than Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Winpak Ltd.'s net income of $36.5M is lower than Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M. Notably, Winpak Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while Sealed Air Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winpak Ltd. is 1.70x versus 1.15x for Sealed Air Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.